New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment

Open access combined with Web 2.0 networking tools is fast changing the traditional journal’s functions and framework and the publisher’s role. As content is more and more available online in digital repositories and on the web, an integrated, interconnected, multidisciplinary information environment is evolving and Oldenburg’s model disintegrates: the journal is no longer the main referring unit for scholarly output, as it used to be, for Scientific, Technical, and Medical disciplines, but scholars’ attention is now more focused on the article level. New journals models are thus evolving. The first part of this paper discusses these new experimental journal models, i.e. overlay journals, interjournals and different levels journals. The second part directs readers’ attention to the role commercial publishers could play in this digital seamless writing arena. The authors consider that publishers should concentrate much more on value-added services for authors, readers and libraries, such as navigational services, discovery services, archiving and evaluation services.

[1]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  Rethinking Scholarly Communication: Building the System that Scholars Deserve , 2004, D Lib Mag..

[2]  Stephen G. Nichols Time to Change Our Thinking: Dismantling the Silo Model of Digital Scholarship , 2009 .

[3]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Fast-Forward on the Green Road to Open Access: The Case Against Mixing Up Green and Gold , 2005, ArXiv.

[4]  Peter Suber Open Access in 2008 , 2009 .

[5]  Theodore C. Bergstrom,et al.  How often do economists self-archive? , 2007 .

[6]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Publish and perish: why the current publication and review model is killing research and wasting your money , 2007, UBIQ.

[7]  P. Geurts,et al.  Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay , 1997 .

[8]  Francesca Di Donato Come si valuta la qualità nella Repubblica della Scienza? Una riflessione sul concetto di peer review , 2007 .

[9]  Mary Kalantzis,et al.  Signs of Epistemic Disruption: Transformations in the Knowledge System of the Academic Journal , 2009, First Monday.

[10]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[11]  R. Spier The history of the peer-review process. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  Chris Armbruster Moving out of Oldenburg's Long Shadow: What is the Future for Society Publishing? , 2007 .

[13]  A. Odlyzko Competition and cooperation: Libraries and publishers in the transition to electronic scholarly journals , 1999 .

[14]  Johan Bollen,et al.  The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Paolo Dall'Aglio Peer review and journal models , 2006 .

[16]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  NEW JOURNAL PUBLISHING MODELS: AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF SENIOR RESEARCHERS , 2005 .

[17]  Jean-Claude Guédon,et al.  In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing , 2005 .

[18]  David E. Shulenburger University Research Publishing or Distribution Strategies , 2007 .

[19]  Arthur P. Smith,et al.  The journal as an overlay on preprint databases , 2000, Learn. Publ..

[20]  Panayiota Polydoratou,et al.  Publishing scientific research: is there ground for new ventures? , 2008, ELPUB.

[21]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability , 2009, Inf. Res..

[22]  Nancy L. Maron,et al.  Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. , 2008 .

[23]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Creating a global knowledge network , 2000 .

[24]  Les Carr,et al.  Incentivizing the Open Access Research Web: Publication-Archiving, Data-Archiving and Scientometrics , 2007 .

[25]  Yvonne Hultman Özek Lund Virtual Medical Journal Makes Self-Archiving Attractive and Easy for Authors , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[26]  Nancy McCormack,et al.  Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know about Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing , 2009 .

[27]  Simeon Warner The transformation of scholarly communication , 2005, Learn. Publ..