Engagement and satisfaction with an Internet-based physical activity intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE To assess the engagement in and satisfaction with an Internet-mediated physical activity intervention with individual supervision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS The intervention studied was one of the two strategies aimed at enhancing physical activity in RA patients that were being compared in a randomized controlled trial. A total of 82 patients, all experienced in using Internet and e-mail and registered at three different rheumatology out-patient clinics, were randomly allocated to the Internet-mediated individualized intervention (52 weeks). They had access to personal physical activity schedules and received individual supervision by a physical therapist by means of weekly e-mail feedback. In addition, telephone contacts, an online discussion forum, six face-to-face group meetings and electronic newsletters were offered. Besides registration of returned physical activity schedules, engagement and satisfaction were measured through questionnaires. RESULTS The median physical activity schedule return rate of the 82 participants was 55%. The mean number of patients logging into the website at least once a week was 53 (70%) over 12 months. Of all patients, 69 returned the questionnaires (response 84%). Telephone contacts were used by 38/67 patients (57%), the mean (SD) number of attended group meetings was 3.1 (1.5) and the discussion forum comprised 15 posted messages. Overall, the proportions of patients being (very) satisfied with the amount of e-mail contacts, telephone contacts, usefulness of website information, physical activity schedules, group meetings and website layout were >/=85%. A smaller proportion of patients were satisfied with the links to other websites (68%), the newsletters (55%) and the online discussion forum (32%). CONCLUSION Physical activity schedules with weekly feedback by e-mail, telephone contacts and a limited number of group meetings were frequently used website tools and modes of communication of an Internet-based physical activity intervention, with high-satisfaction rates from RA patients. Discussion forum and newsletters were less used and appreciated. Caution should be taken when extrapolating the results found to groups of patients who are not experienced Internet and e-mail users or patients with more severe physical disabilities.

[1]  Matthew W Kreuter,et al.  Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. , 2003, American journal of health behavior.

[2]  Carol H Pullen,et al.  Tailored Versus Standard Internet‐delivered Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Older Women , 2005, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[3]  Alison L Marshall,et al.  Print versus website physical activity programs: a randomized trial. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  F. Arnett.  Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[5]  D. Tate,et al.  User attitudes toward a physical activity promotion website. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[6]  S le Cessie,et al.  Using internet technology to deliver a home-based physical activity intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  A. Leon,et al.  Effects of a Partially Home‐Based Exercise Program for Women With Gestational Diabetes , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  K. Patrick,et al.  Evaluation of physical activity web sites for use of behavior change theories , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[9]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  M. Heo,et al.  Are US adults with arthritis meeting public health recommendations for physical activity? , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  S le Cessie,et al.  Effect of intensive exercise on patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  Bonnie Bruce,et al.  The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and Practical Applications , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[13]  O Wiegman,et al.  Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[14]  E. Eurenius,et al.  Physical activity, physical fitness, and general health perception among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  Alison L Marshall,et al.  Website physical activity interventions: preferences of potential users. , 2005, Health education research.

[16]  P Tugwell,et al.  The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire--an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  A. Bauman,et al.  Engagement and retention of participants in a physical activity website. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[18]  Jayne A Fulkerson,et al.  Use of a Web-based component of a nutrition and physical activity behavioral intervention with Girl Scouts. , 2005, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. , 1993, Health economics.

[20]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Is a long-term high-intensity exercise program effective and safe in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  G Borg,et al.  Subjective effort and physical abilities. , 1978, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[23]  D. V. D. Heijde,et al.  The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. , 1997, British journal of rheumatology.

[24]  David Jarjoura,et al.  Effectiveness of a group exercise program in a long-term care facility: a randomized pilot trial. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[25]  R. Chang,et al.  Work Group recommendations: 2002 Exercise and Physical Activity Conference, St Louis, Missouri. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  A. Sundbom,et al.  Home exercise and compliance in inflammatory rheumatic diseases--a prospective clinical trial. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[27]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Evaluation of an internet-based physical activity intervention: A preliminary investigation , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[28]  B Pal,et al.  Following up outpatients by telephone: pilot study , 1998, BMJ.

[29]  J. McDevitt,et al.  Determinants of physical activity and adherence to a 24-week home-based walking program in African American and Caucasian women. , 2003, Research in nursing & health.

[30]  U. Josefsson,et al.  Patients creating self-help on the internet -lessons for future design of internet based healthcare resources , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[31]  M. White,et al.  Factors associated with non-participation in a physical activity promotion trial. , 2006, Public health.

[32]  J. Oldham.  Telephone use in primary care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Promoting physical activity using an activity monitor and a tailored web-based advice: design of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN93896459] , 2005, BMC public health.

[34]  Per Egil Kummervold,et al.  Electronic patient-provider communication: Will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[35]  B. Marcus,et al.  Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention , 1998, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.