Multi-time delay, multi-point linear stochastic estimation of a cavity shear layer velocity from wall-pressure measurements

In this paper, the recently introduced multi-time-delay linear stochastic estimation technique is thoroughly described, focusing on its fundamental properties and potentialities. In the multi-time-delay approach, the estimate of the temporal evolution of the velocity at a given location in the flow field is obtained from multiple past samples of the unconditional sources. The technique is applied to estimate the velocity in a cavity shear layer flow, based on wall-pressure measurements from multiple sensors. The cavity flow was investigated by performing simultaneous measurements of a single hot-wire probe, traversed on a fine grid in the shear layer, and of multiple wall-mounted condenser microphones in the cavity region. The paper compares classical high-order single-time-delay estimation approaches with the multi-time-delay technique, which is significantly more accurate as it produces a much lower mean-square estimation error, thus providing a faithful reconstruction of the time-evolution of the velocity field. This improved accuracy is strongly dependent on the number n of past wall-pressure samples used in the estimate. In this paper, we also demonstrate that the estimated velocity field only contains the signature of the relevant flow mechanisms which correlate well with the wall-pressure, while incoherent components are filtered out. The multi-time-delay approach successfully captures the spatio-temporal dynamics of the velocity fluctuation distribution in the shear layer, as it clearly resolves the dynamics of the relevant flow structures. The effect of the number of sensors used in the estimate was also considered. In general, it was evident that use of more sensors leads to better accuracy, but as the number n of past values increases, the gain becomes marginal.

[1]  Jonathan W. Naughton,et al.  Multi-time-delay LSE-POD complementary approach applied to unsteady high-Reynolds-number near wake flow , 2010 .

[2]  Giles Brereton,et al.  Stochastic estimation as a statistical tool for approximating turbulent conditional averages , 1992 .

[3]  Raffaele Donelli,et al.  Effects of a trapped vortex cell on a thick wing airfoil , 2011 .

[4]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Stochastic estimation of organized turbulent structure: homogeneous shear flow , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Charles E. Tinney,et al.  On spectral linear stochastic estimation , 2006 .

[6]  Yann Guezennec,et al.  An application of the stochastic estimation to the jet mixing layer , 1992 .

[7]  Mark N. Glauser,et al.  Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: Complementary techniques for identifying structure , 1994 .

[8]  A. Naguib,et al.  Stochastic estimation and flow sources associated with surface pressure events in a turbulent boundary layer , 2001 .

[9]  J. Rossiter Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds , 1964 .

[10]  Morteza Gharib,et al.  The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Nathan E. Murray,et al.  Velocity and surface pressure measurements in an open cavity , 2005 .

[12]  M. Franchek,et al.  Active control of flow-induced cavity resonance , 1998 .

[13]  Nathan E. Murray,et al.  Modified quadratic stochastic estimation of resonating subsonic cavity flow , 2007 .

[14]  Mark N. Glauser,et al.  Proportional Closed-Loop Feedback Control of Flow Separation , 2007 .

[15]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Cavity Flow Control Simulations and Experiments , 2005 .

[16]  T. Hynes,et al.  Stochastic estimation of flow near the trailing edge of a NACA0012 airfoil , 2011 .

[17]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Active control of flow-induced cavity oscillations , 2008 .

[18]  Qi Song,et al.  Dynamic Surface Pressure Based Estimation for Flow Control , 2008 .

[19]  F. Aloui,et al.  Synchronized analysis of an unsteady laminar flow downstream of a circular cylinder centred between two parallel walls using PIV and mass transfer probes , 2011 .

[20]  Nathan E. Murray,et al.  Estimation of the flowfield from surface pressure measurements in an open cavity , 2003 .

[21]  Yann Guezennec,et al.  Stochastic estimation of coherent structures in turbulent boundary layers , 1989 .

[22]  A. Naguib,et al.  Stochastic estimation of a separated-flow field using wall-pressure-array measurements , 2006 .

[23]  Ronald Adrian,et al.  Higher‐order estimates of conditional eddies in isotropic turbulence , 1980 .

[24]  Flint O. Thomas,et al.  Coherent structure in a turbulent jet via a vector implementation of the proper orthogonal decomposition , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Raffaele Donelli,et al.  Flow Models for a Vortex Cell , 2009 .

[26]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Flow around a NACA0018 airfoil with a cavity and its dynamical response to acoustic forcing , 2011 .

[27]  Joel Delville,et al.  Pressure velocity coupling in a subsonic round jet , 2000 .

[28]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[29]  Yves Gervais,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigations of low Mach number turbulent cavity flows , 2004 .

[30]  C. Rowley,et al.  On self-sustained oscillations in two-dimensional compressible flow over rectangular cavities , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.