An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment.

We have analysed the Constant-Murley (1987) assessment for 25 patients with shoulder pathology. We found the score easy to use, with low inter- and intraobserver errors, but sufficiently imprecise in repeated measurements to give concern in its use for clinical follow-up of patients. We have calculated 95% confidence limits for a single assessment to be within 16 to 20 points in most cases. In addition, we found that all our subjects with instability as their main problem scored within five points of the maximum; this suggests that the scoring method may need to be revised for use on these patients.

[1]  C. Rowe,et al.  The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  V C Mow,et al.  A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. , 1994, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  I. Clarke,et al.  UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  F A Matsen,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Amstutz Hc,et al.  UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1981 .

[7]  R. Imatani,et al.  Acute, complete acromioclavicular separation. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  A. Carr,et al.  Outcome measures in orthopaedics , 1993 .

[9]  C. Neer,et al.  Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.