Release from output interference in recognition memory: A test of the attention hypothesis

Retrieval results in both costs and benefits to episodic memory. Output interference (OI) refers to the finding that episodic memory accuracy decreases with increasing test trials. Release from OI is the restoration of original accuracy at some point during the test. For example, a release from OI in recognition memory testing occurs when the semantic similarity between stimuli decreases midway through testing, suggesting that item representations stored on early trials cause interference on tests occurring on later trials to the extent that the earlier items share features with the latter items. In two recognition memory experiments, we demonstrate release from OI for words and faces. We also test whether release from OI is the result of interference or is due to a boost in attention caused by reorienting to a novel stimulus type. A test for the foils presented during the initial test list supports the interference account of OI. Implications for models of memory are discussed.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Aslı Kılıç.  Output Interference and Strength Based Mirror Effect in Recognition Memory , 2012 .

[3]  E. Wagenmakers.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: a comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). , 2004, Psychological review.

[5]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Optimal foraging in semantic memory. , 2012, Psychological review.

[6]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[7]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Consequences of Testing Memory , 2014 .

[8]  Brian McElree,et al.  Proactive Interference Slows Recognition by Eliminating Fast Assessments of Familiarity. , 2007 .

[9]  Alexander Etz,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Output interference in recognition memory , 2011 .

[11]  D. Wickens,et al.  Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory , 1963 .

[12]  William R Aue,et al.  Dynamic memory searches: Selective output interference for the memory of facts , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  Encoding Categories of Words: An Empirical Approach to Meaning. , 1970 .

[15]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Overcoming the Negative Consequences of Interference From Recognition Memory Testing , 2012, Psychological science.

[16]  A. Criss.  THE REPRESENTATION OF SINGLE ITEMS AND ASSOCIATIONS IN EPISODIC MEMORY , 2004 .

[17]  M. Watkins,et al.  Buildup of Proactive Inhibition as a Cue-Overload Effect. , 1975 .

[18]  Adam F. Osth,et al.  Sources of interference in item and associative recognition memory. , 2015, Psychological review.

[19]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: The effects of letter frequency and object frequency , 2008 .

[20]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[21]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[22]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[23]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Models that allow us to perceive the world more accurately also allow us to remember past events more accurately via differentiation , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  List discrimination in associative recognition and implications for representation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Jeffrey Annis,et al.  Sources of interference in recognition testing. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements in forced-choice recognition: Absolute judgments can preclude relative judgments , 2017 .

[29]  K. Malmberg,et al.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Gregory J. Koop,et al.  The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[32]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[33]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  Encoding, storage, and retrieval of item information , 1975 .

[34]  W. A. Bousfield,et al.  An Analysis of Sequences of Restricted Associative Responses , 1944 .

[35]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  Memory and the theory of signal detection. , 1970 .

[36]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[38]  Amy H. Criss,et al.  Associative information in memory: Evidence from cued recall , 2012 .

[39]  D. Gallo,et al.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[40]  K. Malmberg,et al.  Discriminating between changes in bias and changes in accuracy for recognition memory of emotional stimuli , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[41]  H L Roediger,et al.  Inhibiting effects of recall , 1974, Memory & cognition.