The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation

The relationship of individual differences, perceptions of lying in everyday life and perceptions of lying in a high stakes scenario (plagiarism at University) was investigated. It was expected that the personality constructs of Acting, Manipulativeness, Impression Management and Sociability would be positively related to a perceived ability to lie in everyday life and in a high stakes scenario, and that the construct of Anxiousness would be negatively related to the perceived ability to lie in everyday life and in a high stakes scenario. Undergraduate students (n=265) were administered five personality construct measures, and a series of questions and statements concerning perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation. In everyday life, there were significant findings for Acting and Manipulativeness in relation to perceptions of experiencing little guilt and mental effort whilst lying, experiencing duping delight, finding lying easy and that the lies are undetectable. Significant findings were also yielded for Anxiousness and Sociability, in relation to perceptions of feeling guilty and of manipulating others while lying. The hypotheses regarding Impression Management was rejected. In the high stake scenario there were significant findings for Manipulativeness in relation to the perceptions of feeling comfortable (before, during and after) the lie, being believed by the target of the lie and perceiving the situation better dealt with a lie rather than the truth, and Anxiousness in relation to planning the lie and being uncomfortable while lying. They hypotheses regarding Acting, Sociability and Impression Management were rejected. The implications for future research on individual differences and deceptive behaviour are discussed.

[1]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Lying and deception in everyday life , 1993 .

[2]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Individual Differences and Cues to Deception , 1983 .

[4]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  P. Ekman.  Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace , 1985 .

[6]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception , 1989 .

[7]  R. Riggio.  Assessment of Basic Social Skills , 1986 .

[8]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[9]  M. Knapp,et al.  An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct , 1974 .

[10]  David Nyberg,et al.  The varnished truth : truth telling and deceiving in ordinary life , 1994 .

[11]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Social Skills and Deception Ability , 1987 .

[12]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  An analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale. , 1980 .

[13]  Paul Ekman,et al.  Lies that fail. , 1993 .

[14]  F. Goldman-Eisler.  Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[15]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[16]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[17]  M. Zuckerman.  Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception , 1981 .

[18]  A. Buss,et al.  Shyness and sociability. , 1981 .

[19]  A. Vrij.  Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice , 2000 .

[20]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  W. Thornton,et al.  Criminal Behavior and the Justice System: Psychological Perspectives. , 1990 .

[22]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Nature of Arousal and Nonverbal Indices , 1989 .

[23]  R. Christie,et al.  Studies in Machiavellianism , 1970 .

[24]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Individual differences in persistence in lying and experiences while deceiving , 1998 .

[25]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Individual Differences in Hand Movements During Deception , 1997 .

[26]  Günter Köhnken,et al.  Behavioral Correlates of Statement Credibility: Theories, Paradigms, and Results , 1989 .

[27]  H. Eysenck.  Dimensions of Personality , 1947 .