Well Parameters' Estimation using Traditional and Non-traditional Methods

Knowledge of accurate values of well parameters like well loss coefficient (C) and aquifer loss coefficient (B) are important for successful modeling and proper management of ground water resources. In the present paper, B and C were determined using various traditional and nontraditional methods. These methods include traditional gradient-based nonlinear optimization technique like Gauss-Newton (GN) and non-traditional optimization techniques like Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Genetic-Algorithm (GA). The study found that PSO and GA depend on search space but are non-sensitive to initial guesses, whereas, GN is sensitive to the initial guesses of well parameters. It is also concluded that PSO, which is motivated by social behaviour of organisms such as bird flocking and fish schooling, gives better forecasts of B and C when the data is discreet and full of noise.

[1]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[2]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION 1 Locating and Tracking Multiple Dynamic Optima by a Particle Swarm Model Using Speciation , 2022 .

[3]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Matching algorithms to problems: an experimental test of the particle swarm and some genetic algorithms on the multimodal problem generator , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[4]  Peter J. Angeline,et al.  Evolutionary Optimization Versus Particle Swarm Optimization: Philosophy and Performance Differences , 1998, Evolutionary Programming.

[5]  M. I. Rorabaugh Graphical and Theoretical Analysis of Step-Drawdown Test of Artesian Well , 1953 .

[6]  C. E. Jacob Drawdown Test to Determine Effective Radius of Artesian Well , 1947 .

[7]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[8]  D. McKinney,et al.  Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models , 1994 .

[9]  Tim Hendtlass,et al.  A Combined Swarm Differential Evolution Algorithm for Optimization Problems , 2001, IEA/AIE.

[10]  Madan K. Jha,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters from Pumping Test Data by Genetic Algorithm Optimization Technique , 2003 .

[11]  Alex Alves Freitas,et al.  A hybrid particle swarm/ant colony algorithm for the classification of hierarchical biological data , 2005, Proceedings 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2005. SIS 2005..

[12]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Application of optimisation techniques in groundwater quantity and quality management , 2001 .

[13]  Vedat Batu Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis , 1998 .

[14]  Jigui Sun,et al.  An Improved Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for TSP , 2007, 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops.

[15]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.