A validation of a computer‐assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security

Summary. In the Netherlands, there is a research tradition that measures fraud against regulations by interviewing eligible individuals using a survey. In these studies the sensitive questions about fraud are posed by using a randomized response method.The paper describes the results of a Dutch study into the consequences of replacing home interviews by trained interviewers with Internet-delivered interviews in a survey on fraud in the area of disability benefits. Both surveys used computer-assisted self-interviews with randomized response questions. This study has three goals: first to present the research tradition that makes use of randomized response, second to compare the results of home interviews and the Internet survey and finally to introduce an adapted weighted logistic regression method to test the relationship between the probability of fraud and explanatory variables. The results show that there are no systematic differences between modes of interview, either for estimates of the prevalence of fraud or for the identification of associated variables. These outcomes result in the conclusion that the Internet survey is a useful and cost-effective instrument for measuring fraud in a population, and that it is unlikely that replacing home interviews with the Internet survey will result in a significant break with tradition.

[1]  W. Aquilino,et al.  Collecting Sensitive Self-Report Data With Laptop Computers: Impact on the Response Tendencies of Adolescents in a Home Interview , 1999 .

[2]  Peter G. M. van der Heijden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research , 2005 .

[3]  A. Hout,et al.  Randomized Response, Statistical Disclosure Control and Misclassificatio: a Review , 2002 .

[4]  Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders.  META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED RESPONSE RESEARCH: 35 YEARS OF VALIDATION STUDIES , 2000 .

[5]  C. Renzetti.  Doing Research on Sensitive Topics , 1992 .

[6]  M. Bolino,et al.  Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Peter G. M. van der Heijden,et al.  The logistic regression model with response variables subject to randomized response , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[8]  J. Hox,et al.  A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Direct Questioning , 2000 .

[9]  F. Vella.  Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey , 1998 .

[10]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[11]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method , 1991 .

[12]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Explaining Regulatory Non-compliance: A Survey Study of Rule Transgression for Two Dutch Instrumental Laws, Applying the Randomized Response Method , 2003 .

[13]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques , 1987 .

[14]  Hennie Boeije,et al.  Honest by Chance: a Qualitative Interview Study to Clarify Respondents' (Non-)Compliance With Computer-Assisted Randomized Response , 2002 .

[15]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Collecting "Sensitive" Data in Business Ethics Research: A Case for the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT) , 1997 .

[16]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Item Randomized-Response Models for Measuring Noncompliance: Risk-Return Perceptions, Social Influences, and Self-Protective Responses , 2007 .

[17]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables , 1992 .

[18]  Anthony Y. C. Kuk,et al.  Asking sensitive questions indirectly , 1990 .

[19]  Thomas A. Buchman,et al.  Obtaining Responses To Sensitive Questions - Conventional Questionnaire Versus Randomized-Response Technique , 1982 .

[20]  D. Dillman.  The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[21]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[22]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[23]  Peter G. M. van der Heijden,et al.  The Analysis of Multivariate Misclassified Data With Special Attention to Randomized Response Data , 2004 .

[24]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Cognition and Survey Research , 2000, Technometrics.

[25]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Cognition and survey research , 2000 .

[26]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  Covariate Randomized Response Models , 1988 .

[27]  Samuel Himmelfarb,et al.  Social desirability and the randomized response technique. , 1982 .