In-Vivo and Postmortem Biomechanics of Abdominal Organs Under Compressive Loads: Experimental Approa

In order to provide realistic haptic (touch) feedback, simulators must incorporate accurate computational models of the in-vivo mechanical behavior of soft tissues. It is important to test tissues in surgically relevant ranges of applied force, duration, and deformation. In order to determine these ranges, a system known as the Blue DRAGON has been created that can track the motions of and the forces applied to surgical tools during live procedures. Thirty-one surgeons of varying skill were recorded performing three different surgical tasks. The mean force applied to the tool handles during tissue grasps was 8.52 N ± 2.77 N. Ninety-five percent of the handle angle frequency content was below 1.98 Hz ± 0.98 Hz. Average grasp time was 2.29 s ± 1.65 s, and 95 of all grasps observed were held for less than 8.86 s ± 7.06 s. The average maximum grasp time performed by surgeons during these tasks was 13.37 s ± 11.42 s. Using these values as design parameters, a computer-controlled, motorized endoscopic grasper (MEG) has been designed to obtain biomechanical properties of soft tissues in-vivo. The MEG uses a geared DC motor to drive a Babcock grasper using a cable-and-pulley mechanism. The motor is capable of producing the equivalent of 26.5 N of grasping force (470 kPa) by the end effector jaws. Two strain gage force-sensing beams are mounted in the partial pulley to accurately measure applied force. Computer-control is provided using a proportional-derivative position controller to command cyclic (up to 3 Hz) or step loadings. The MEG can be hand-held, weighs about 0.7 kg, and can be inserted into the body through standard endoscopic ports. The MEG has been calibrated and validated on linear springs with known stiffness. The MEG has been used to test 7 different porcine abdominal organs in-vivo and through 24 hours postmortem. Elastic and relaxation properties have been recorded and analyzed. Constitutive force-deformation relations have been fit to the elastic data, and stress relaxation functions have been fit to the stress-time data recorded during relaxation tests. An understanding of how the tissue properties and model parameters are influenced by time postmortem and loading condition has been obtained.

[1]  Dr. KAROL Miller Technical Note: Modelling Soft Tissue Using Biphasic Theory - A Word of Caution. , 1998, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  M. Ottensmeyer,et al.  TeMPeST I-D: An instrument for measuring solid organ soft tissue properties , 2002 .

[4]  P Flüeler,et al.  Material characterization of the pig kidney in relation with the biomechanical analysis of renal trauma. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  William Raymond Ledoux A biomechanical model of the human foot with emphasis on the plantar soft tissue , 1999 .

[7]  A K Morimoto,et al.  Force sensor for laparoscopic Babcock. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  J Rosen,et al.  Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures--evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[9]  Yong-San Yoon,et al.  Application of linear biphasic theory to finite element analysis of head impulse loading , 1997 .

[10]  A P Pathak,et al.  A rate-controlled indentor for in vivo analysis of residual limb tissues. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  K Miller,et al.  Constitutive modelling of abdominal organs. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal injuries. , 2001, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[14]  F. Duck Physical properties of tissue , 1990 .

[15]  L. Bilston,et al.  On the viscoelastic character of liver tissue: experiments and modelling of the linear behaviour. , 2000, Biorheology.

[16]  Y. Fung Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. , 1967, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  F.C.T. van der Helm,et al.  Analysis of muscle and joint loads , 2005 .

[18]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Computerized endoscopic surgical grasper. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[19]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Black Falcon: a teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[20]  J S Jurvelin,et al.  Biphasic poroviscoelastic simulation of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage: I--Simultaneous prediction of reaction force and lateral displacement. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  H. Gregersen,et al.  History-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Guinea-Pig Small Intestine , 1998, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  G A Ateshian,et al.  A Conewise Linear Elasticity mixture model for the analysis of tension-compression nonlinearity in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear. , 1997, Biorheology.

[24]  I. Fazekas,et al.  Die Druckfestigkeit der menschlichen Leber mit besonderer Hinsicht auf die Verkehrsunfälle , 2005, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[25]  R. Haut Biomechanics of Soft Tissue , 2002 .

[26]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints: a review of twenty years of progress. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  V C Mow,et al.  Finite deformation biphasic material properties of bovine articular cartilage from confined compression experiments. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  M. Ottensmeyer Minimally invasive instrument for in vivo measurement of solid organ mechanical impedance , 2001 .

[29]  E. Mays,et al.  Bursting injuries of the liver. A complex surgical challenge. , 1966, Archives of surgery.

[30]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery-experimental performance evaluation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  G. Buess,et al.  Independent testing of soft tissue visco-elasticity using indentation and rotary shear deformations. , 2003, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[33]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  The BlueDRAGON - a system for measuring the kinematics and dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in-vivo , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[34]  F Glenn,et al.  Graded trauma in liver injury. , 1966, The Journal of trauma.

[35]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[36]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Mathematical modelling for keyhole surgery simulations: a biomechanical model for spleen tissue , 2002 .

[37]  W M Lai,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  M. Ottensmeyer In vivo measurement of solid organ visco-elastic properties. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[39]  R L Stalnaker,et al.  A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  A F Mak,et al.  Objective assessment of limb tissue elasticity: development of a manual indentation procedure. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[41]  R. Spilker,et al.  Indentation analysis of biphasic articular cartilage: nonlinear phenomena under finite deformation. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[42]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Design and Performance of a Surgical Tool Tracking System for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2001 .

[43]  A F Mak,et al.  Extraction of quasi-linear viscoelastic parameters for lower limb soft tissues from manual indentation experiment. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[44]  Mark P. Ottensmeyer,et al.  In-vivo mechanical tissue property measurement for improved simulations , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[45]  J. Suh,et al.  A cross-validation of the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, indentation, and confined compression. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  H Demiray Large deformation analysis of some soft biological tissues. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[48]  A A Young,et al.  A triaxial-measurement shear-test device for soft biological tissues. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[49]  King H. Yang,et al.  Mechanical characterization of porcine abdominal organs. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[50]  W M Lai,et al.  A triphasic theory for the swelling and deformation behaviors of articular cartilage. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[51]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Impact Injury Mechanisms in Abdominal Organs , 1973 .

[52]  J. Suh,et al.  Biphasic poroviscoelastic simulation of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage: II--Effect of variable strain rates. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[53]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Measurement, Analysis, and Display of Haptic Signals During Surgical Cutting , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[54]  J. Suh,et al.  Finite element formulation of biphasic poroviscoelastic model for articular cartilage. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[55]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Unconfined compression of articular cartilage: nonlinear behavior and comparison with a fibril-reinforced biphasic model. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[56]  S. Cowin,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[57]  J Rosen,et al.  Objective laparoscopic skills assessments of surgical residents using Hidden Markov Models based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions. , 2001, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[58]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[59]  W D Pilkey,et al.  Linear and quasi-linear viscoelastic characterization of ankle ligaments. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[60]  J Rosen,et al.  Hidden Markov models of minimally invasive surgery. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[61]  S L Woo,et al.  Quasi-linear viscoelastic properties of normal articular cartilage. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[62]  P Karg,et al.  A compound sensor for biomechanical analyses of buttock soft tissue in vivo. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[63]  C. Gao,et al.  Biomechanical and morphological properties in rat large intestine. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[64]  Chimba Mkandawire,et al.  A QUASI-LINEAR VISCOELASTIC MODEL OF FOOT-ANKLE LIGAMENTS , 2001 .

[65]  J. M. Trujillo Enhancing the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design of the Force Reflective Endoscopic Grasper , 1997 .

[66]  V C Mow,et al.  The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[67]  Stephen W. Rouhana,et al.  Biomechanics of Abdominal Trauma , 2002 .

[68]  S. Woo,et al.  On the viscoelastic properties of the anteromedial bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[69]  T. G. Frank,et al.  Puncture forces of solid organ surfaces , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[70]  Van C. Mow,et al.  Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus , 2005 .

[71]  B. Hannaford,et al.  In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues. , 2003, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[72]  Michael Bajka,et al.  Method and device for in-vivo measurement of elasto-mechanical properties of soft biological tissues , 1999 .

[73]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Skills evaluation in minimally invasive surgery using force/torque signatures , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[74]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Computer-controlled motorized endoscopic grasper for in vivo measurement of soft tissue biomechanical characteristics. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[75]  F Tendick,et al.  Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation. , 2001, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[76]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Artificial Muscles : Actuators for Biorobotic Systems , 1999 .

[77]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  A sensor-based minimally invasive surgery tool for detecting tissutal elastic properties(003) 5323219 , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[78]  S L Woo,et al.  The time and history-dependent viscoelastic properties of the canine medical collateral ligament. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[79]  K B Arbogast,et al.  A high-frequency shear device for testing soft biological tissues. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[80]  K Miller,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[81]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  The Blue DRAGON--a system for monitoring the kinematics and the dynamics of endoscopic tools in minimally invasive surgery for objective laparoscopic skill assessment. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.