Mind the Noise Covariance When Localizing Brain Sources with M/EEG

Magneto encephalography (MEG) and electroen-cephalography (EEG) are imaging methods that measure neuronal dynamics non invasively with high temporal precision. It is often desired in MEG and EEG analysis to estimate the neural sources of the signals. Strategies used for this purpose often take into account the covariance between sensors to yield more precise estimates of the sources. Here we investigate in greater detail how the quality of such covariance estimates conditions the estimation of MEG and EEG sources. We investigated three distinct source localization methods: dynamic Statistical Parametric Maps (dSPM), the linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beam former and Mixed-Norm Estimates (MxNE). We implemented and evaluated automated strategies for improving the quality of covariance estimates at different stages of data processing. Our results show that irrespective of the source localization method, accuracy can suffer from improper covariance estimation but can be improved by relying on automated regularization of covariance estimates.

[1]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[2]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[3]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[5]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices , 2004 .

[7]  A. Gramfort,et al.  Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals , 2015, NeuroImage.

[10]  David Barber,et al.  Bayesian reasoning and machine learning , 2012 .

[11]  R. Henson,et al.  Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Improved MEG/EEG source localization with reweighted mixed-norms , 2014, 2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging.