Development of an MRI-Compatible Device for Prostate Focal Therapy

We present a device that has been developed for delivering prostate focal thermal therapy under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. Unlike most existing devices, ours is capable of delivering needles to targets in the prostate without removing the patient from the scanner. This feature greatly reduces procedure time and increases accuracy. The device consists of a mechanical linkage encoded with optical incremental encoders, and is manually actuated. A custom magnetic resonance (MR) compatible alignment interface allows the user to manually align the device to its target with high accuracy in-bore in very short time. The use of manual actuation over motors greatly reduces the complexity and bulk of the system, making it much more compact and portable. This is important when dealing with such tight space constraints. Needle targeting experiments in gel phantoms have demonstrated the device's ability to deliver needles with an accuracy of 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm.

[1]  P. Albertsen,et al.  Outcomes following active surveillance of men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the prostate specific antigen era. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[3]  T. Stamey,et al.  Multiple cancers in the prostate. Morphologic features of clinically recognized versus incidental tumors , 1992, Cancer.

[4]  R. Weersink,et al.  Construction and evaluation of an anatomically correct multi-image modality compatible phantom for prostate cancer focal ablation. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  Deming Wang,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  Alexandre Mamedov,et al.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Design and Preliminary Accuracy Studies of an MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Intervention System , 2007, MICCAI.

[11]  Tom W J Scheenen,et al.  The accuracy and safety aspects of a novel robotic needle guide manipulator to perform transrectal prostate biopsies. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Robot-assisted MRI-guided prostatic interventions , 2009, Robotica.

[13]  David M. Doddrell,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  L. Klotz,et al.  CLINICAL RESULTS OF LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP OF A LARGE ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT , 2009 .

[15]  Alexandru Patriciu,et al.  “MRI Stealth” robot for prostate interventions , 2007, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[16]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2007, 10th International Conference, Brisbane, Australia, October 29 - November 2, 2007, Proceedings, Part I , 2007, MICCAI.

[17]  Deming Wang,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.