Do Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws Affect Criminal Behavior?

Sex offenders have become targets of some of the most far-reaching and novel crime legislation in the United States. Two key innovations have been registration and notification laws, which, respectively, require that offenders provide identifying information to law enforcement and mandate that this information be made fully public. We study how registration and notification affect the frequency and incidence across victims of reported sex offenses. We present evidence that registration reduces the frequency of reported sex offenses against local victims (for example, neighbors) by keeping police informed about local sex offenders. Notification also appears to reduce crime, not by disrupting the criminal conduct of convicted sex offenders, but by deterring nonregistered offenders. We find that notification may actually increase recidivism. This latter finding, consistent with the idea that notification imposes severe costs that offset the benefits to offenders of forgoing criminal activity, is significant, given that notification’s purpose is recidivism reduction.

[1]  R. Bachman,et al.  The Rationality of Sexual Offending: Testing a Deterrence/Rational Choice Conception of Sexual Assault , 1992 .

[2]  Emily Owens,et al.  COPS and crime , 2007 .

[3]  Abril R. Bedarf Examining Sex Offender Community Notification Laws , 1995 .

[4]  R. E. Freeman-longo Prevention or problem , 1996 .

[5]  Lawrence F. Travis,et al.  Sex offender notification and fear of victimization , 2004 .

[6]  Amanda Y. Agan Sex Offender Registries: Fear without Function? , 2011, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[7]  Leigh L. Linden,et al.  Estimates of the Impact of Crime Risk on Property Values from Megan's Laws , 2008 .

[8]  Radha K. Iyengar I'd Rather Be Hanged for a Sheep than a Lamb: the Unintended Consequences of 'Three-Strikes' Laws , 2008 .

[9]  B. Winick Sex offender law in the 1990s: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis. , 1998 .

[10]  W. MacLeod,et al.  First Do No Harm?: Tort Reform and Birth Outcomes , 2006 .

[11]  Steven D. Levitt Juvenile Crime and Punishment , 1997 .

[12]  David S. Lee,et al.  Crime, Punishment, and Myopia , 2005 .

[13]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE DYNAMICS OF CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR: EVIDENCE FROM WEATHER SHOCKS , 2022 .

[14]  R. Prentky Community Notification and Constructive Risk Reduction , 1996 .

[15]  P. Langan,et al.  Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 , 2002 .

[16]  Leigh L. Linden,et al.  There Goes the Neighborhood? Estimates of the Impact of Crime Risk on Property Values from Megan's Laws , 2006 .

[17]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Crime and Justice.

[18]  Jill S. Levenson,et al.  Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence , 2007 .

[19]  Mary Ann Farkas,et al.  Sex Offender Community Notification: Assessing the Impact in Wisconsin: (527532006-001) , 2000 .

[20]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[21]  Stephen G. Donald,et al.  Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[22]  C. Hensley,et al.  Contextualizing Sex Offender Management Legislation and Policy: Evaluating the Problem of Latent Consequences in Community Notification Laws , 2001 .

[23]  R. K. Hanson Recidivism and Age: Follow-Up Data From 4,673 Sexual Offenders , 2002 .

[24]  J. Andreoni,et al.  Do Police Reduce Crime ? Estimates Using the Allocation of Police Forces After a Terrorist Attack , 2003 .

[25]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Using Sentence Enhancements to Distinguish between Deterrence and Incapacitation , 1998 .

[26]  D. Filler Making the Case for Megan’s Law: A Study in Legislative Rhetoric , 2001 .

[27]  P. Langan,et al.  Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994 , 2012 .

[28]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models , 1985 .

[29]  R. Tewksbury Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration , 2005 .

[30]  M. Farkas,et al.  Sex offender community notification: managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? , 2000, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[31]  R. Lieb Community Notification Laws: , 1996 .

[32]  Jeffery T. Walker,et al.  The Influence of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws in the United States , 2008 .

[33]  Lois Presser,et al.  Strange Bedfellows: Is Sex Offender Notification a Form of Community Justice? , 1999 .

[34]  D. Teichman Sex, Shame, and the Law: An Economic Perspective on Megan's Laws , 2005 .

[35]  Jill S. Levenson,et al.  The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration , 2005 .