Edith Penrose and a learning-based perspective on the MNE and OLI

Abstract and Key ResultsWe apply insights from Edith Penrose’s work to extant theory of the multinational enterprise (MNE) as enveloped by John Dunning’s Ownership, Location, Internalization (OLI) Paradigm.We suggest that Penrose’s knowledge/learning-based approach has important implications on the nature of, and the interactions between, O, L and I, and it helps endogenize and integrate the three elements of Dunning’s triad in the context of a dynamic, and strategic perspective of the MNE.More importantly, a learning-based perspective adds a cognitive dimension to the MNE and OLI.This supports a forward looking, synchronic decision making view, that may lead to apparently sub-optimal decisions, taken in view of anticipated changes, along-side strategic behaviour, aiming to effect such change, once decisions have been reached.A Penrosean-inspired knowledge/learning-based perspective helps render the OLI more dynamic, strategic and forward looking.

[1]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[2]  E. Penrose,et al.  Foreign Investment and the Growth of the Firm , 1956 .

[3]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy , 2004 .

[4]  Austen Albu.  Organisation of Industry , 2021, Nature.

[5]  J. Dunning.  The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity , 2000 .

[6]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Edith penrose: Pioneer of stakeholder theory , 1998 .

[7]  M. Casson,et al.  The future of the multinational enterprise , 1977 .

[8]  J. Dunning,et al.  American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry. , 1959 .

[9]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory , 2003 .

[10]  A. Rugman,et al.  Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management , 2002 .

[11]  S. Hymer.  international operations of national firms , 1976 .

[12]  E. Penrose.  The Growth of the Firm—A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company , 1960, Business History Review.

[13]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose , 2003 .

[14]  Neil M. Kay,et al.  Hercules and Penrose , 1999 .

[15]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  TOWARD A MANAGERIAL THEORY OF THE MNC , 2004 .

[16]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Key Literature on IB Activities: 1960–2000 , 2001 .

[17]  Robin Marris.  Edith Penrose and Economics , 1999 .

[18]  Lawrence S. Lewin,et al.  Setting the Record Straight , 1988 .

[19]  O. Williamson.  The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes , 1981 .

[20]  J. Dunning.  American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry , 1959 .

[21]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  TOWARDS A NEW PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPMENT , 1998 .

[22]  J. Dunning.  Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach , 1977 .

[23]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  A theory of the (growth of the) transnational firm: a Penrosean perspective , 2000 .

[24]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity: The Selected Essays of John H. Dunning, Volume I , 2000 .

[25]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Entrepreneurship in multinational enterprises: A Penrosean perspective , 2007 .

[26]  S. Hymer.  THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION AND THE LAW OF UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT , 1982 .

[27]  J. Dunning.  The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions , 1988 .

[28]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Stephen Hymer: Life and the Political Economy of Multinational Corporate Capital , 2002 .

[29]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Twenty years resource-based view (or is it 50?): some (old and) new challenges and need for extensions , 2007 .

[30]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Preface by Guest Editor , 2002 .

[31]  David J. Teece,et al.  Reflections on the Hymer thesis and the multinational enterprise , 2006 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[33]  Haruo H. Horaguchi,et al.  Setting the Record Straight: Hymer, Internationalization Theory and Transaction Cost Economics , 1990 .

[34]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The contribution of Edith Penrose to international business scholarship , 2003 .

[35]  J. Dunning.  Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? , 1998 .

[36]  S. Hymer.  The Efficiency (Contradictions) of Multinational Corporations , 1970 .

[37]  E. Penrose,et al.  The large international firm in developing countries : the international petroleum industry , 1968 .