Metribuzin degradation in soil. I, Effects of soybean residue amendment, metribuzin level, and soil depth

Plant residue and soil depth effects on metribuzin degradation were investigated. Dundee silt loam soil collected at depth increments of 0–10 cm (SUR) and 10–35 cm (SUB) was treated with labeled [5−14 C]metribuzin. Samples were assayed at several time points up to 140 days after treatment. Soybean residue was added to half of the SUR samples (RES), with remaining SUR unamended (NORES). None of the SUB samples were amended with soybean residue. Metribuzin mineralization to 14CO2 proceeded more slowly in RES and SUB than in NORES and SUR, respectively. Extractable components in SUR samples included polar metabolites, plus deaminated metribuzin (DA) in the RES, and parent metribuzin in the NORES. Deaminated diketometribuzin (DADK) and metribuzin comprised major 14C components extracted from SUB, while in SUR, faster degradation of metabolites resulted in metrizubin as the primary identifiable compound. Unextractable 14C increased until day 35 for both RES and NORES, after which it remained constant for NORES. but declined for RES. A corresponding rise in RES polar 14C suggested that as soybean residue decomposed, 14C bound in the residue was released as extractable polar material. Soil with soybean residue accumulation may alter metabolite degradation patterns, but does not impede initial metribuzin degradation. Depth differences in metribuzin degradation were attributed to reductions in microbial activity with increasing soil depth.

[1]  K. E. Savage Metribuzin Persistence in Soil , 1977, Weed Science.

[2]  G. Stephenson,et al.  Behavior and Fate of Metribuzin in Eight Ontario Soils , 1976, Weed Science.

[3]  M. Locke,et al.  Metribuzin degradation in soil: II—effects of tillage , 1991 .

[4]  D. Marx,et al.  Fate of Metribuzin, Metolachlor, and Fluometuron in Soil , 1982, Weed Science.

[5]  D. Focht,et al.  Deterministic Three-Half-Order Kinetic Model for Microbial Degradation of Added Carbon Substrates in Soil , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  G. B. Schaalje,et al.  A two-compartment model for the dissipation of deltamethrin on soil , 1985 .

[7]  P. Shea,et al.  Interception and Retention of Atrazine by Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Stubble , 1984, Weed Science.

[8]  R. Hance,et al.  The kinetics of linuron and metribuzin decomposition in soil using different laboratory systems , 1981 .

[9]  R. Zimdahl,et al.  Rate of Degradation of Metribuzin and Two Analogs in Soil , 1974, Weed Science.

[10]  R. Hütter,et al.  Ametryne and Prometryne as Sulfur Sources for Bacteria , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  D. V. Naylor,et al.  Metribuzin Degradation Kinetics in Organically Amended Soil , 1985, Weed Science.

[12]  R. Hütter,et al.  s-Triazines as nitrogen sources for bacteria , 1981 .

[13]  P. A. Banks,et al.  The Influence of Straw Mulch on the Soil Reception and Persistence of Metribuzin , 1982, Weed Science.

[14]  Richard Allen,et al.  The influence of soil properties on the rates of degradation of metamitron, metazachlor and metribuzin , 1987 .

[15]  C. Goring,et al.  Turnover of Pesticide Residues in Soil , 1976 .

[16]  R. Bartha,et al.  Features of a Flask and Method for Measuring the Persistence and Biological Effects of Pesticides in Soil , 1965 .

[17]  T. Moorman,et al.  Transformation and Mineralization of Metribuzin in Surface and Subsurface Horizons of a Mississippi Delta Soil , 1989 .

[18]  T. T. Bauman,et al.  Effect of Three Tillage Systems on the Persistence of Atrazine , 1983, Weed Science.

[19]  R. Hütter,et al.  Deethylsimazine: bacterial dechlorination, deamination, and complete degradation , 1984 .

[20]  K. E. Savage Adsorption and Mobility of Metribuzin in Soil , 1976 .

[21]  S. Harper Sorption of Metribuzin in Surface and Subsurface Soils of the Mississippi Delta Region , 1988, Weed Science.

[22]  P. A. Banks,et al.  Soil Reception and Activity of Acetochlor, Alachlor, and Metolachlor as Affected by Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Straw and Irrigation , 1986, Weed Science.