Uji sitotoksisitas mikrofiber PMMA dan PMMA-Silika wetspinning pada kultur sel primer L-929 sebagai aplikasi penguat jembatan gigi direkCytotoxicity test of PMMA and PMMA-Silica wet spinning microfibers in L-929 primary cell culture as a direct dental bridge reinforcement application

Introduction: Direct dental bridge consists of a fiber reinforcement component and a composite resin matrix component. The use of target cells for the cytotoxicity test of dental fiber materials is generally performed by experimental in-vitro tests to determine the clinical relevance of the test. This study was aimed to examine the cytotoxicity of PMMA and PMMA-silica wet spinning microfibers with different parameters on the primary cell culture (cell line) of L-929 fibroblasts. Methods: The research design was descriptive qualitative. Primary L-929 fibroblast cells were exposed to PMMA and PMMA-silica microfibers consecutively for 1, 4, and 7 days. Cytotoxicity test was performed using the MTT Assay. Parameters of PMMA and PMMA-silica microfibers used were concentration and flow rate, then divided into several research groups and named as follows: PMMA microfiber vertical system 250ml/hour with a concentration in %: 0.75(A); 1(B); 1.25(C); PMMA-silica microfiber vertical system with the speed of 200 ml/hour (D), 250 ml/hour (E), 300 ml/hour (F) and PMMA microfiber with rotation system 200 ml/ hour with a concentration in % 0.75(G );1(H), 1,25(I); PMMA-silica microfiber rotation system with concentrations of 200ml/hour (J), 250ml/hour (K), and 300 ml/hour (L). Results: In-vitro test of the L-929 cell picture showed no primary fibroblast cells that died. The cell line growth curve of each microfiber parameter shows that the cells can proliferate during the incubation period and show a positive trend of cell growth. Conclusions: PMMA and MMAsilica wet spinning microfibers did not show any toxicity to the growth of the L-929 fibroblast cell line, so they have potential as reinforcement applications for direct dental bridges.

[1]  Muhammad Sohail Zafar Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update , 2020, Polymers.

[2]  B. Milekic,et al.  Modulus, Strength and Cytotoxicity of PMMA-Silica Nanocomposites , 2020, Coatings.

[3]  Arief Cahyanto,et al.  Performance of Electrospun PMMA-Silica Nanofiber as Reinforced Material in Dental Composite Restoration , 2020 .

[4]  M. Munir,et al.  Flexural Strength Evaluation of Dental Post Prototype Contain ZAS-PMMA Composite Fiber with Electrospinning Methods , 2019 .

[5]  Chang Hui-Yi,et al.  Preparation of hydrophobic nanofibers by electrospinning of PMMA dissolved in 2-propanol and water , 2019, MATEC Web of Conferences.

[6]  Xifei Li,et al.  Enhancement of interaction of L-929 cells with functionalized graphene via COOH+ ion implantation vs. chemical method , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Amit Gupta,et al.  Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin Bridge: A Treatment Option in Children , 2015, International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[8]  M. Nele,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) PMMA and Evaluation of Cytotoxicity for Biomedical Application , 2014 .

[9]  N. Goonoo,et al.  In vitro and in vivo cytocompatibility of electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for tissue engineering applications , 2014 .

[10]  Yuan Gao,et al.  A Comparative Study on Root Canal Repair Materials: A Cytocompatibility Assessment in L929 and MG63 Cells , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[11]  Merin Rose Mathew,et al.  Flexural Strength of E-glass-reinforced PMMA , 2014 .

[12]  Aaron Tan,et al.  Nanomaterial scaffolds for stem cell proliferation and differentiation in tissue engineering. , 2013, Biotechnology advances.

[13]  A. Orlacchio,et al.  Stem cell-biomaterial interactions for regenerative medicine. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[14]  J. Matinlinna,et al.  E-Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites in Dental Applications , 2011, Silicon.