Does STS Mean Business?

In recent years Science and Technology Studies (STS) has been subject to various uses and transformations, especially as STS has been appropriated within new contexts, including management studies and business schools.1 This paper examines the nature and consequences of these moves whereby STS comes into contact with Organization and Management Studies (OMS)2 and of the shifts of STS into business schools and into business and management environments. Thus stated, our task appears relatively straightforward. We need to describe how, where and when has STS moved, in what ways has it had an infl uence, and with what effect? The fi rst part of this paper attempts just such a description. We call this our smooth narrative. It depicts STS as a largely homogenous entity and raises questions about the different contexts in which it fi nds itself, about the effects of its movement and appropriation upon its purportedly ‘radical’ pretensions, and the mode and manner of its engagement with others. However, it turns out that this task, while (perhaps) relatively uncomplicated in relation to many other areas of social science, throws up a whole series of interesting issues and challenges when asked of the movement and fate of STS. In brief, these issues and challenges arise because STS itself has much to say about the contingent character of academic practice

[1]  Marc Berg,et al.  The contextual nature of medical information , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  D. Neyland,et al.  Marketing mobile futures: assembling constituencies and creating compelling stories for an emerging technology , 2008 .

[3]  J. Hassard,et al.  Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the Production of Actor-Network Accounts , 2004 .

[4]  The Politics of Symmetry , 1996 .

[5]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[6]  M. Lynch,et al.  Science and Technology Studies on Trial: , 2005 .

[7]  Ending Up On the Wrong Side: Must the Two Forms of Radicalism Always Be at War? , 1996 .

[8]  M. Lien Marketing and Modernity , 1997 .

[9]  M. Berg The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design , 1998 .

[10]  P. Boczkowski Bridging STS and communication studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies , 2007 .

[11]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[12]  David H. DeVorkin,et al.  Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance , 1990 .

[13]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  The Commercialization of Science and the Response of STS , 2008 .

[14]  B. Cooke The Managing of the (Third) World , 2004 .

[15]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[16]  Steve Woolgar What happened to provocation in science and technology studies? , 2004 .

[17]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  Authors’ Addresses , 2006 .

[18]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Critical management studies: some reflections , 2008 .

[20]  K. Dale,et al.  Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational Control , 2005 .

[21]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  The Outer Limits: Monsters, Actor Networks and the Writing of Displacement , 1999 .

[22]  R. Munro,et al.  Organization Theory, 1985–2005 , 2005 .

[23]  S. Woolgar The Turn to Technology in Social Studies of Science , 1991 .

[24]  S. Woolgar Social basis of interactive social science , 2000 .

[25]  G N Gilbert,et al.  Warranting Scientific Belief , 1982, Social studies of science.

[26]  B. Martin Sticking a Needle into Science: The Case of Polio Vaccines and the Origin of AIDS , 1996 .

[27]  H. Nowotny,et al.  Joy in Repetition Makes the Future Disappear , 2003 .

[28]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems , 2002 .

[29]  Beth A. Bechky Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge , 2000 .

[31]  M. Callon,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[32]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[33]  J. Harris The Ordering of Things: Organization in Bruno Latour , 2005 .

[34]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[35]  A. Spicer,et al.  Is Actor Network Theory Critique? , 2008 .

[36]  J OrlikowskiWanda,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone , 2006 .

[37]  M. Gibbons Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science , 2000 .

[38]  L. Araujo,et al.  Market practices and forms: introduction to the special issue , 2008 .

[39]  P. Dear Science Studies as Epistemography Peter Dear , 2001 .

[40]  L. Winner Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology , 1993 .

[41]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .

[42]  Barbara Czarniawska On Time, Space, and Action Nets , 2004 .

[43]  A. Rip,et al.  Users and unicorns: a discussion of mythical beasts in interactive science , 2000 .

[44]  H. Willmott,et al.  You Spin Me Round: The Realist Turn in Organization and Management Studies , 2005 .

[45]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[46]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.

[47]  Frank Blackler,et al.  On the Life of the Object , 2005 .

[48]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Accountability in action?: the case of a database purchasing decision. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[49]  A. Mol The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[50]  K. Starkey,et al.  Rethinking the Business School , 2004 .

[51]  D. Hess,et al.  Science Studies and Activism , 2002 .

[52]  Barbara Czarniawska,et al.  The Question of Technology , or How Organizations Inscribe the World , 2001 .

[53]  Melvin Pollner,et al.  Left of Ethnomethodology: The Rise and Decline of Radical Reflexivity , 1991 .

[54]  N. Wakeford,et al.  Feminist Technoscience: Intimacy, Embodiment and Abjection in Science Studies , 2006 .

[55]  Naomi Klein,et al.  No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies , 1999 .

[56]  Attila Bruni,et al.  Shadowing Software and Clinical Records: On the Ethnography of Non-Humans and Heterogeneous Contexts , 2005 .

[57]  M. Callon,et al.  Economic markets as calculative collective devices , 2005 .

[58]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[60]  John Hassard,et al.  Organization Unbound: Actor-Network Theory, Research Strategy and Institutional Flexibility , 1999 .

[61]  B. Latour Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[62]  Catelijne Coopmans,et al.  Structure and agency? Actor-network theory and strategic organization , 2006 .

[63]  Graeme Salaman,et al.  THE CULT[URE] OF THE CUSTOMER , 1992 .

[64]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[65]  D. Smith Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions , 2001 .

[66]  Meera Nanda,et al.  Prophets Facing Backward: Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India , 2003 .

[67]  S. Böhm,et al.  Liberalist Fantasies: Žižek and the Impossibility of the Open Society , 2007 .

[68]  Anne Beaulieu,et al.  Critical Accountability: Dilemmas for Interventionist Studies of e-Science , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities , 1996, CHI.

[70]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Science, the very idea , 1988 .

[71]  Michael Mulkay,et al.  The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis , 1985 .

[72]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Business School Business: Some Lessons from the U.S. Experience , 2004 .

[73]  Gerhild Fuchs,et al.  Introduction (E) , 2018, ATeM Archiv für Textmusikforschung.

[74]  H. Nowotny,et al.  Joy in Repetition Makes the Future Disappear. A Critical Assessment of the Present State of STS , 2003 .

[75]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The research process: context, autonomy and audience , 1996 .

[76]  Claes-Fredrik Helgesson,et al.  On the nature of markets and their practices , 2007 .