A fuzzy preference‐ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites

This article presents a quality evaluation model for measuring the performance of hospital Web sites. The model is developed on the basis of a conceptual framework, which consists of seven major e‐service quality dimensions, including tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, confidence, empathy, quality of information, and integration of communication issues of Web sites. The dimensions and their associated attributes are first obtained from published articles in the health care and information technology literature and then adapted according to the suggestions of related domain experts. Two multicriteria decision‐making methods are used in the evaluation procedure. Determined Web site evaluation dimensions and their relevant attributes are weighted using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Vagueness in some stages of the evaluation required the incorporation of fuzzy numbers in the assessment process. Both fuzzy and crisp data are then synthesized using the fuzzy PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) ranking method. The model is applied initially to measure the performance of the Web sites of Turkish hospitals. This study should be of interest to health care and technology practitioners and researchers, as the findings shed light on the further development of performance measurements for hospital Web sites. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Int Syst 21: 1181–1197, 2006.

[1]  H.-J. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy set theory—and its applications (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[2]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD , 1985 .

[3]  Z. Babic,et al.  Ranking of enterprises based on multicriterial analysis , 1998 .

[4]  R. Law,et al.  Developing a performance indicator for hotel websites , 2003 .

[5]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Conceptualizing Web site quality and its consequences in the lodging industry , 2003 .

[7]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[8]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Model choice in multicriteria decision aid , 1997 .

[10]  Hungyune Chao,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Academic Libraries on the Web: The Development and Testing of Criteria. , 2002 .

[11]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval , 1981, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Thomas S. Gruca,et al.  Hospital web sites: Promise and progress , 2004 .

[13]  Johan Springael,et al.  PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Alain Schärlig,et al.  Pratiquer Electre et Prométhée : un complément à Décider sur plusieurs critères , 1996 .

[15]  Michele Colajanni,et al.  Web system reliability and performance: design and testing methodologies , 2005 .

[16]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[17]  D. Dubois,et al.  Operations on fuzzy numbers , 1978 .

[18]  Nicolae-George Dragulanescu,et al.  Website Quality Evaluations: Criteria and Tools , 2002 .

[19]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Key quality factors in Web site design and use: an examination , 2002 .

[20]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Measuring user perceptions of Web site reputation , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Helmut Schneider,et al.  Web site design benchmarking within industry groups , 2003, Internet Res..

[22]  Min Xie,et al.  Measuring web-based service quality , 2002 .

[23]  J. Martel,et al.  A multi‐criterion approach for selecting attractive portfolio , 2002 .

[24]  Abha Agrawal,et al.  A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[25]  Alastair G. Smith,et al.  Applying evaluation criteria to New Zealand government websites , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Aspects of decision support in water management--example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I--spatially differentiated evaluation. , 2004, Water research.

[27]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  An integrated decision aid system for Bosphorus water-crossing problem , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Jos van Iwaarden,et al.  Perceptions about the quality of web sites: a survey amongst students at Northeastern University and Erasmus University , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Soyoung Kim,et al.  Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Measuring Web site quality improvements: a case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[31]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products' design with ill-defined data on environmental quality , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Web pages of Slovenian public libraries: evaluation and guidelines , 2004, J. Documentation.

[33]  David C. Chou,et al.  Healthcare information portal: a web technology for the healthcare community , 2002 .

[34]  M. Goumas,et al.  An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Rian van der Merwe,et al.  A framework and methodology for evaluating e-commerce Web sites , 2003, Internet Res..

[36]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[37]  Ying-Feng Kuo,et al.  Integrating Kano’s Model into Web- community Service Quality , 2004 .

[38]  Füsun Ülengin,et al.  Energy for the future: An integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey , 2004 .

[39]  Charles Kaylor,et al.  Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  Amir Albadvi,et al.  Formulating national information technology strategies: A preference ranking model using PROMETHEE method , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Francisco Javier Miranda González,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of commercial web sites: : an empirical study of Spanish firms , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..