Anticipatory locomotor adjustments of the trail limb during surface accommodation.

This paper explores anticipatory locomotor adjustments of the trail limb when stepping up to a new level. The kinematics and kinetics of the trail limb for nine subjects were compared across level gait and surface accommodation. The largest generation of new rotational energy was found at the trail ankle, during the latter part of stance (i.e. ankle 'push-off'). Accelerations of the head, arms and trunk (HAT) and foot segments during the same phase indicate that the ankle power acted to push the body and lead limb up onto the new level and drive the foot upwards at toe-off. The shank was more vertical at toe-off to ensure that the ankle energy would drive the limb upwards, rather than forward into the surface. The vertical hip translation energy increased over 300%, acting to pull upwards on the hip to increase trail limb elevation. The increased hip translational energy could be due to extension of the lead limb after it was placed on the surface and/or the piston-like drive of the increased rotational energy at the trail ankle during late stance. The findings add to the knowledge of whole body coordination strategies during anticipatory locomotor adjustments when the entire body is raised to a new level.

[1]  S. Grillner,et al.  The locomotion of the low spinal cat. I. Coordination within a hindlimb. , 1980, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  B. McFadyen,et al.  Adaptations in bilateral mechanical power patterns during obstacle avoidance reveal distinct control strategies for limb elevation versus limb progression. , 2004, Motor control.

[3]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[4]  F. Zajac,et al.  Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R R Neptune,et al.  Muscle mechanical work requirements during normal walking: the energetic cost of raising the body's center-of-mass is significant. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  W. Sparrow,et al.  Gait characteristics of young and older individuals negotiating a raised surface: implications for the prevention of falls. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  B. J. McFadyen,et al.  Anticipatory locomotor adjustments for accommodating versus avoiding level changes in humans , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  H Labelle,et al.  Functional roles of ankle and hip sagittal muscle moments in able-bodied gait. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  Steven J Stanhope,et al.  Joint moment control of mechanical energy flow during normal gait. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[11]  Bradford J. McFadyen,et al.  Anticipatory locomotor adjustments for avoiding visible, fixed obstacles of varying proximity ☆ , 1993 .

[12]  S. Zill,et al.  Common motor mechanisms support body load in serially homologous legs of cockroaches in posture and walking , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  F. Prince,et al.  Avoidance and accommodation of surface height changes by healthy, community-dwelling, young, and elderly men. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[14]  William H Gage,et al.  Bilateral lower limb strategies used during a step-up task in individuals who have undergone unilateral total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  A E Patla,et al.  Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. , 2001, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.