Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review

The impact of the introduction and advancement in communication technology in recent years on exposure level of the population is largely unknown. The main aim of this study is to systematically review literature on the distribution of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in the everyday environment in Europe and summarize key characteristics of various types of RF-EMF studies conducted in the European countries. We systematically searched the ISI Web of Science for relevant literature published between 1 January 2000 and 30 April 2015, which assessed RF-EMF exposure levels by any of the methods: spot measurements, personal measurement with trained researchers and personal measurement with volunteers. Twenty-one published studies met our eligibility criteria of which 10 were spot measurements studies, 5 were personal measurement studies with trained researchers (microenvironmental), 5 were personal measurement studies with volunteers and 1 was a mixed methods study combining data collected by volunteers and trained researchers. RF-EMF data included in the studies were collected between 2005 and 2013. The mean total RF-EMF exposure for spot measurements in European “Homes” and “Outdoor” microenvironments was 0.29 and 0.54 V/m, respectively. In the personal measurements studies with trained researchers, the mean total RF-EMF exposure was 0.24 V/m in “Home” and 0.76 V/m in “Outdoor”. In the personal measurement studies with volunteers, the population weighted mean total RF-EMF exposure was 0.16 V/m in “Homes” and 0.20 V/m in “Outdoor”. Among all European microenvironments in “Transportation”, the highest mean total RF-EMF 1.96 V/m was found in trains of Belgium during 2007 where more than 95% of exposure was contributed by uplink. Typical RF-EMF exposure levels are substantially below regulatory limits. We found considerable differences between studies according to the type of measurements procedures, which precludes cross-country comparison or evaluating temporal trends. A comparable RF-EMF monitoring concept is needed to accurately identify typical RF-EMF exposure levels in the everyday environment.

[1]  Johannes Tomitsch,et al.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields in households—Trends from 2006 to 2012 , 2015, Bioelectromagnetics.

[2]  M. Blumenthal,et al.  Communicating with the public , 2005, Conference Record Cement Industry Technical Conference, 2005..

[3]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Katja Radon,et al.  Exposure to mobile telecommunication networks assessed using personal dosimetry and well-being in children and adolescents: the German MobilEe-study , 2008, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[5]  Andreas Siegenthaler,et al.  Exposure modeling of high-frequency electromagnetic fields , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[6]  T. Eikelboom,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. , 2012, Environment international.

[7]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[8]  C. Bornkessel,et al.  Determination of the general public exposure around GSM and UMTS base stations. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  J. Bolte Lessons learnt on biases and uncertainties in personal exposure measurement surveys of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields with exposimeters. , 2016, Environment international.

[10]  Luc Martens,et al.  Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities. , 2014, Environmental research.

[11]  Katja Radon,et al.  Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well‐being in adults: A cross‐sectional study based on dosimetry , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  P. Wiedemann,et al.  Do people understand IARC's 2B categorization of RF fields from cell phones? , 2014, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  Luc Martens,et al.  PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT OF GENERAL PUBLIC EXPOSURE FROM WLAN IN OFFICES AND IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK TESTBED , 2010, Health physics.

[14]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  What input data are needed to accurately model electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations? , 2014, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[15]  Luc Martens,et al.  Comparison of temporal realistic telecommunication base station exposure with worst-case estimation in two countries. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  Luc Martens,et al.  Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits. , 2014, Environment international.

[17]  M. Eeftens,et al.  Use of portable exposimeters to monitor radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in the everyday environment. , 2015, Environmental research.

[18]  Achilles Boursianis,et al.  Continuous electromagnetic radiation monitoring in the environment: analysis of the results in Greece. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  Luc Martens,et al.  Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[20]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  Spatial and temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of children and adults in indoor micro environments in Belgium and Greece. , 2013, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[21]  Jimmy Estenberg,et al.  Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system , 2014, Bioelectromagnetics.

[22]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. , 2009, Environment international.

[23]  G. Vermeeren,et al.  In situ LTE exposure of the general public: Characterization and extrapolation , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[24]  G Berg-Beckhoff,et al.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields , 2008, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[25]  K. Joyner,et al.  Comparative international analysis of radiofrequency exposure surveys of mobile communication radio base stations , 2012, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[26]  Luc Martens,et al.  Assessment of RF Exposures from Emerging Wireless Communication Technologies in Different Environments , 2012, Health physics.

[27]  W. Joseph,et al.  Assessment of Radio Frequency Exposures in Schools, Homes, and Public Places in Belgium , 2014, Health physics.

[28]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz) , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[29]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. , 2009, Environmental research.

[30]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Comparison of average global exposure of population induced by a macro 3G network in different geographical areas in France and Serbia , 2016, Bioelectromagnetics.

[31]  Damiano Scanferla,et al.  Time Averaged Transmitter Power and Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phone Base Stations , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[32]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies. , 2014, Environment international.

[33]  Tom Dhaene,et al.  Assessment of outdoor radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure through hotspot localization using kriging-based sequential sampling. , 2013, Environmental research.

[34]  G. Thuróczy,et al.  Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. , 2010, Environmental research.

[35]  M. Blettner,et al.  Residential characteristics and radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposures from bedroom measurements in Germany , 2012, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[36]  Luc Martens,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF PERSONAL RF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AND ACTUAL ABSORPTION FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 2008, Health physics.

[37]  Y. Cho,et al.  Risk perception and public concerns of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones in Korea , 2014, Bioelectromagnetics.