Input Selection of Wavelet-Coupled Neural Network Models for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling

The use of wavelet-coupled data-driven models is increasing in the field of hydrological modelling. However, wavelet-coupled artificial neural network (ANN) models inherit the disadvantages of containing more complex structure and enhanced simulation time as a result of use of increased multiple input sub-series obtained by the wavelet transformation (WT). So, the identification of dominant wavelet sub-series containing significant information regarding the hydrological system and subsequent use of those dominant sub-series only as input is crucial for the development of wavelet-coupled ANN models. This study is therefore conducted to evaluate various approaches for selection of dominant wavelet sub-series and their effect on other critical issues of suitable wavelet function, decomposition level and input vector for the development of wavelet-coupled rainfall-runoff models. Four different approaches to identify dominant wavelet sub-series, ten different wavelet functions, nine decomposition levels, and five different input vectors are considered in the present study. Out of four tested approaches, the study advocates the use of relative weight analysis (RWA) for the selection of dominant input wavelet sub-series in the development of wavelet-coupled models. The db8 and the dmey (Discrete approximation of Meyer) wavelet functions at level nine were found to provide the best performance with the RWA approach.

[1]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[2]  Özgür Kisi,et al.  Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[3]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  Hybrid Wavelet Neuro-Fuzzy Approach for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[4]  J. W. Johnson A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression , 2000, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  O. Kisi,et al.  Short-term and long-term streamflow forecasting using a wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model , 2010 .

[6]  Taher Rajaee,et al.  Wavelet and ANN combination model for prediction of daily suspended sediment load in rivers. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Rathinasamy Maheswaran,et al.  Comparative study of different wavelets for hydrologic forecasting , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  Scott Tonidandel,et al.  Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[9]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDATION OF SELECTION PROCEDURES: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE , 2008 .

[10]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research , 2004 .

[11]  O. Kisi,et al.  Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting , 2007 .

[12]  Linda See,et al.  Data preprocessing for river flow forecasting using neural networks: Wavelet transforms and data partitioning , 2006 .

[13]  Roy D. Wallen,et al.  The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook , 2004 .

[14]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Precipitation Forecasting Using Wavelet-Genetic Programming and Wavelet-Neuro-Fuzzy Conjunction Models , 2011 .

[15]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative Study , 2020, Definitions.

[16]  D. Budescu Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. , 1993 .

[17]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  A Monte Carlo Comparison of Relative Importance Methodologies , 2004 .

[18]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Applications of hybrid wavelet–Artificial Intelligence models in hydrology: A review , 2014 .

[19]  D. Budescu,et al.  The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[20]  Raj Mohan Singh Wavelet-ANN Model for Flood Events , 2011, SocProS.

[21]  Scott Tonidandel,et al.  Multivariate relative importance: extending relative weight analysis to multivariate criterion spaces. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Wensheng Wang,et al.  Wavelet Network Model and Its Application to the Prediction of Hydrology , 2003 .

[23]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  Hybrid Wavelet-Genetic Programming Approach to Optimize ANN Modeling of Rainfall-Runoff Process , 2012 .

[24]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[25]  O. Kisi Wavelet Regression Model as an Alternative to Neural Networks for River Stage Forecasting , 2011 .

[26]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  A Comparative Study of Various Hybrid Wavelet Feedforward Neural Network Models for Runoff Forecasting , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[27]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Jeff W. Johnson Factors Affecting Relative Weights: The Influence of Sampling and Measurement Error , 2004 .

[29]  Jose C. Principe,et al.  Neural and adaptive systems , 2000 .

[30]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  Comparative study of different wavelet based neural network models for rainfall–runoff modeling , 2014 .