A common metric magnitude system for the perception and production of numerosity, length, and duration

Numerosity, length, and duration processing may share a common functional mechanism situated within the parietal cortex. A strong parallelism between the processing of these three magnitudes has been revealed by similar behavioral signatures (e.g., Weber–Fechner's law, the distance effect) and reciprocal interference effects. Here, we extend the behavioral evidence for a common magnitude processing mechanism by exploring whether the under- and overestimation patterns observed during numerical perception and production tasks are also present in length and duration perception and production. In a first experiment, participants had to perform two estimation tasks (i.e., perception and production) on three magnitudes (i.e., numerosities, lengths, and durations). The results demonstrate similar patterns for the three magnitudes: underestimation was observed in all perception tasks, whereas overestimation was found in all production tasks. A second experiment ensured that this pattern of under- and over-estimation was not solely generated by the mere process of perceiving or producing something. Participants were required to estimate the alphabetical position of a letter (i.e., perception task) or to produce the letter corresponding to a given position (i.e., production task). No under- or overestimation were observed in this experiment, which suggests that the process of perceiving or producing something alone cannot explain the systematic pattern of estimation observed on magnitudes. Together, these findings strengthen the idea that magnitude estimations share a common metric system, requiring similar mechanisms and/or representations.

[1]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[2]  David C. Burr,et al.  Underestimation of perceived number at the time of saccades , 2011, Vision Research.

[3]  Michael Andres,et al.  Dissociation of numerosity and duration processing in the left intraparietal sulcus: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2008, Cortex.

[4]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Time in the mind: Using space to think about time , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  L E Krueger,et al.  Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Musicians Outperform Nonmusicians in Magnitude Estimation: Evidence of a Common Processing Mechanism for Time, Space and Numbers , 2022 .

[9]  Lester E. Krueger,et al.  Perceived numerosity , 1972 .

[10]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[12]  L. E. Krueger,et al.  Single judgments of numerosity , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Interaction of Numerosity and Time in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Quantity determination and the distance effect with letters, numbers, and shapes: a functional MR imaging study of number processing. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  Donald McEwen Johnson,et al.  Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment , 1939 .

[16]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[17]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[18]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Numerical estimation in blind subjects: evidence of the impact of blindness and its following experience. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  The equality of quantity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  W. Bevan,et al.  ASSIMILATION AND CONTRAST IN THE ESTIMATION OF NUMBER. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  E. Brannon,et al.  Monotonic Coding of Numerosity in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area , 2007, PLoS biology.

[23]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[24]  Wim Fias,et al.  Number Processing Pathways in Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Wearden,et al.  Perception of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli in Children and Adults , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children , 2009, Cognition.

[28]  Carmelo Mario Vicario,et al.  Perceiving Numbers Affects the Subjective Temporal Midpoint , 2011, Perception.

[29]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Numerosity-length interference: a Stroop experiment. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[31]  V. Henmon,et al.  The Time of Perception as a Measure of Differences in Sensations , 2009 .

[32]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Numerosity-duration interference: a Stroop experiment. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[33]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  The right parietal cortex and time perception: back to Critchley and the Zeitraffer phenomenon , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[34]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Processing numerosity, length and duration in a three-dimensional Stroop-like task: towards a gradient of processing automaticity? , 2013, Psychological research.

[35]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Processing magnitudes within the parietal cortex , 2012 .

[36]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Regression effect in psychophysical judgment , 1966 .

[37]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[38]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[40]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  S. S. Stevens The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Numbers and time doubly dissociate , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Dissociations and interactions between time, numerosity and space processing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Common and Specific Contributions of the Intraparietal Sulci to Numerosity and Length Processing , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[48]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Time and numerosity estimation are independent: Behavioral evidence for two different systems using a conflict paradigm , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[49]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy. , 2006, Developmental science.

[50]  T. Indow,et al.  Scaling of dot numerosity , 1977 .

[51]  Sumarga H. Suanda,et al.  Temporal discrimination increases in precision over development and parallels the development of numerosity discrimination. , 2007, Developmental science.

[52]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Numerical and nonnumerical estimation in children with and without mathematical learning disabilities , 2012, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[53]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Under- and over-estimation: a bi-directional mapping process between symbolic and non-symbolic representations of number? , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[54]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  Michael Andres,et al.  Contribution of the right intraparietal sulcus to numerosity and length processing: An fMRI-guided TMS study , 2012, Cortex.

[56]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[58]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  Big Time Is Not Always Long , 2011, Psychological science.

[59]  D. Burr,et al.  Saccades compress space, time and number , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Cognitive processes in counting. , 1987 .

[61]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Over-estimation in numerosity estimation tasks: more than an attentional bias? , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[62]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[63]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[64]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[65]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[67]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Six-month-old infants use analog magnitudes to represent duration. , 2006, Developmental science.

[68]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[69]  Clarisse Aichelburg,et al.  When Time and Numerosity Interfere: The Longer the More, and the More the Longer , 2012, PloS one.

[70]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Dissociation between numerosity and duration processing in aging and early Parkinson's disease , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  Stefan Golaszewski,et al.  Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[72]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  A common right fronto‐parietal network for numerosity and duration processing: An fMRI study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[73]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  Speeding up a master clock common to time, number and length? , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[74]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  M. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  David Burr,et al.  Time Perception: Space–Time in the Brain , 2006, Current Biology.

[77]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[79]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[80]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[81]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.