Reactive power service cost allocation using aumann-shapley method

There is a general consensus that there should be a separate reactive power market to manage the provision of reactive power in a deregulated power system. Owing to the importance of such a reactive power service for system reliability and its complexity, a significant degree of obligation and centralised control are needed in this market. A centrally-managed reactive power market model is adopted in which the system operator, taking into account the technical feasibility and economic efficiency, procures the required reactive service from the competitive reactive power suppliers and the incurred cost is fully allocated to all users. A reactive power optimum power flow is used as a tool for the procurement and dispatching of reactive power services. As the reactive power can be consumed directly or consumed indirectly, accompanied by the transportation of real power, difficulties arise in the cost allocation process, especially in a pool-bilateral coexisting real power energy market. A reactive power cost allocation scheme using the Aumann-Shapley method is proposed to tackle this challenge. A modified IEEE 14-bus system is used to demonstrate the validity of the proposed methodology.

[1]  Fushuan Wen,et al.  A study of reactive power marginal price in electricity market , 2001 .

[2]  A. El-Keib,et al.  Calculating short-run marginal costs of active and reactive power production , 1997 .

[3]  Shangyou Hao,et al.  Reactive power pricing and management , 1997 .

[4]  Louis J. Billera,et al.  Internal Telephone Billing Rates - A Novel Application of Non-Atomic Game Theory , 1978, Oper. Res..

[5]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Power transfer allocation for open access using graph theory-fundamentals and applications in systems without loopflow , 2000 .

[6]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  Advanced pricing in electrical systems. II. Implications , 1997 .

[7]  Wen-Chen Chu,et al.  Allocating the costs of reactive power purchased in an ancillary service market by modified Y-bus matrix method , 2004 .

[8]  Yair Tauman,et al.  Demand Compatible Equitable Cost Sharing Prices , 1982, Math. Oper. Res..

[9]  J. W. Lamont,et al.  Cost analysis of reactive power support , 1999 .

[10]  Louis J. Billera,et al.  Allocation of Shared Costs: A Set of Axioms Yielding A Unique Procedure , 1982, Math. Oper. Res..

[11]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  Real-time pricing of reactive power: theory and case study results , 1991, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  Shangyou Hao,et al.  A reactive power management proposal for transmission operators , 2003 .

[13]  M. Caramanis,et al.  Optimal Spot Pricing: Practice and Theory , 1982, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[14]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplement charge allocation in transmission open access , 1997 .

[15]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Numerical Linear Algebra and Optimization , 1991 .