Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning

For radiotherapy, it is crucial to guarantee that the delivered dose matches the planned dose. Therefore, patient specific quality assurance (QA) of absolute dose distributions is necessary. Here, we investigate the potential of replacing patient specific QA for pencil beam scanned proton therapy with Monte Carlo simulations. First, the set-up of the automated Monte Carlo model is presented with an emphasis on the absolute dose validation. Second, the absolute dose results obtained from the Monte Carlo simulation for a comprehensive set of patient fields are compared to patient specific QA measurements. Absolute doses measured with the Farmer chamber are shown to be 1.4% higher than the doses measured with the Semiflex chamber. For single energy layers, Monte Carlo simulated doses are 2.1%  ±  0.4% lower than the ones measured with the ionization chamber and 1.1%  ±  1.0% lower than measurements compared to patient field verification measurements. After rescaling to account for this 1.1% discrepancy, 98 fields (94.2%) agree within 2% to measurements, the maximum difference being 2.3%. In conclusion, an automated, easy-to-use Monte Carlo calculation system has been set up. This system reproduced patient specific QA results over a wide range of cases, showing that the time consuming measurements could be reduced or even replaced using Monte Carlo simulations without jeopardizing treatment quality.

[1]  H. Kooy,et al.  Golden beam data for proton pencil-beam scanning , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  L Grevillot,et al.  A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4 , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  E. Pedroni,et al.  Dose calculation models for proton treatment planning using a dynamic beam delivery system: an attempt to include density heterogeneity effects in the analytical dose calculation. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  A. Lomax,et al.  A study of lateral fall-off (penumbra) optimisation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Christian Hilbes,et al.  The PSI Gantry 2: a second generation proton scanning gantry. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[6]  H Paganetti,et al.  Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[7]  S Safai,et al.  Proton beam monitor chamber calibration , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A. Lomax,et al.  Factors influencing the performance of patient specific quality assurance for pencil beam scanning IMPT fields. , 2016, Medical physics.

[10]  Luc Beaulieu,et al.  Layered mass geometry: a novel technique to overlay seeds and applicators onto patient geometry in Geant4 brachytherapy simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Joao Seco,et al.  Automated Monte Carlo Simulation of Proton Therapy Treatment Plans , 2016, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[12]  Eros Pedroni,et al.  Improving the precision and performance of proton pencil beam scanning , 2012 .

[13]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[14]  A J Lomax,et al.  Independent dose calculations for commissioning, quality assurance and dose reconstruction of PBS proton therapy , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Alessandra Bolsi,et al.  Treatment log files as a tool to identify treatment plan sensitivity to inaccuracies in scanned proton beam delivery. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Reply to comment on 'Proton beam monitor chamber calibration'. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  S Lorentini,et al.  Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  A motorized solid-state phantom for patient-specific dose verification in ion beam radiotherapy. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Michael Gillin,et al.  Verification of patient-specific dose distributions in proton therapy using a commercial two-dimensional ion chamber array. , 2010, Medical physics.

[20]  T. Solberg,et al.  Use of a novel two-dimensional ionization chamber array for pencil beam scanning proton therapy beam quality assurance. , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[21]  H. Paganetti,et al.  Physics Settings for Using the Geant4 Toolkit in Proton Therapy , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  Eros Pedroni,et al.  Pencil beam characteristics of the next-generation proton scanning gantry of PSI: design issues and initial commissioning results , 2011 .

[23]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations for absolute dosimetry to determine machine outputs for proton therapy fields , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  D C Weber,et al.  Assessing the quality of proton PBS treatment delivery using machine log files: comprehensive analysis of clinical treatments delivered at PSI Gantry 2 , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  E Pedroni,et al.  Experimental characterization and physical modelling of the dose distribution of scanned proton pencil beams , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Comparison of Monte Carlo and analytical dose computations for intensity modulated proton therapy , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .

[28]  H Paganetti,et al.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications. , 2012, Medical physics.

[29]  A. Lomax,et al.  Characterizing a proton beam scanning system for Monte Carlo dose calculation in patients , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  J. Sempau,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using detailed simulation of ionization chambers , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Martin Grossmann,et al.  More than 10 years experience of beam monitoring with the Gantry 1 spot scanning proton therapy facility at PSI. , 2009, Medical physics.

[32]  S. Vörös,et al.  Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Alessandra Bolsi,et al.  Treatment planning and verification of proton therapy using spot scanning: initial experiences. , 2004, Medical physics.