Radial k-space acquisition improves robustness of MR-based attenuation maps for MR/PET quantification in an animal imaging study of the abdomen

One of the most important steps in positron emission tomography (PET) is the correction of photon attenuation for accurate quantitative PET. Currently, FDA approved clinical MR/PET systems employ segmentation of conventional, low resolution, gradient echo (GRE) based, T1-weighted MR images to generate maps for MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC). However, these acquisitions are optimized for imaging human subjects and exhibit artifacts when used in preclinical MR/PET studies. Pronounced breathing artifacts in animal models used for preclinical imaging, impede accurate segmentation for generation of attenuation maps, impacting quantitative measurements of reconstructed PET images. We propose a radial k-space acquisition sequence designed to redistribute coherent breathing artifacts that result from Cartesian k-space trajectories into incoherent pseudo-noise spread across the image domain. PET data from five rabbits was reconstructed using the system standard MR-derived attenuation map with segmentation errors, due to breathing artifacts in the Cartesian acquisition (cartMR map), the manually segmented MR-derived attenuation map (msegMR map) and the radially acquired MR sequence used to generate an attenuation map from the system standard segmentation algorithm (radMR map). The resulting attenuation corrected PET data sets (PETcartMRmap, PETmsegMRmap, and PETradMRmap) were then qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. Voxel-by-voxel comparison of PET values for all five rabbits showed excellent correlation between PETmsegMRmap and PETradMRmap SUV values (R=0.999, p0.0001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the mean of the difference of SUVs between PETmsegMRmap and PETradMRmap voxels for all five rabbits was 0.53% (0.004±0.014SD). Region-of-interest-based comparison showed that PETradMRmap and PETmsegMRmap methods differ in SUVmean by -0.7% to 0.9% and SUVmax by -1.2% to 2.7%. Employing a radial k-space MR acquisition during preclinical MR/PET protocols facilitates highly accurate segmentation and PET quantification, without the need for subjective user input and is therefore, better suited for use in preclinical MR/PET protocols than the existing MR Cartesian acquisition.

[1]  V. Schulz,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[2]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  David Izquierdo-Garcia,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Magnetic Resonance-Guided [18-F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Human Carotid Arteries: Reproducibility, Partial Volume Correction, and Correlation Between Methods , 2009, Stroke.

[6]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Sune H. Keller,et al.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[8]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  H. Zaidi,et al.  An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. , 2011, Medical physics.

[10]  S R Cherry,et al.  Attenuation correction using count-limited transmission data in positron emission tomography. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  David W Townsend,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  F. Hofheinz,et al.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction , 2012, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[13]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  V. Schulz,et al.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[15]  Susanne Heinzer,et al.  Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer’s perspective , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[16]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  The current state, challenges and perspectives of MR-PET , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  An automatic classification technique for attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.