Optimal DR Activation Strategy for Risk Aversion Considering Hourly Loads and Locational Prices

Demand response (DR) activation and dispatch introduce additional economic and security benefits to the power system operation and control. The strategies for DR activation and compensation are among critical market operation issues which continue to raise concerns among stakeholders. In this respect, DR cost allocation would be required to guarantee DR benefits to the independent system operator and individual participating consumers. This paper proposes a DR activation strategy considering hourly system load and locational marginal prices (LMPs) in which payoffs are optimized at effective LMP where DR dispatch occurs. This paper presents a closed-form solution for the DR activation strategy according to the FERC’s Net Benefits Test. A DR cost reallocation method is proposed using the contribution factor theory for managing financial risks which ensures market participants’ optimal payoff corresponding to the DR dispatch. The proposed framework is extended to consider practical DR activation strategies and cost reallocations. Case studies based on the IEEE 6-bus system and the IEEE 118-bus system illustrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed DR activation strategy and cost reallocation method.

[1]  Xu Wang,et al.  Bidding strategy analysis of virtual power plant considering demand response and uncertainty of renewable energy , 2017 .

[2]  Louis-A. Dessaint,et al.  Multi-objective stochastic optimal power flow considering voltage stability and demand response with significant wind penetration , 2017 .

[3]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[4]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  Demand Response in Electricity Markets: An Overview , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[5]  Zita Vale,et al.  Cost allocation model for distribution networks considering high penetration of distributed energy resources , 2015 .

[6]  Konstantinos Kopsidas,et al.  Optimal Demand Response Scheduling With Real-Time Thermal Ratings of Overhead Lines for Improved Network Reliability , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  William W. Hogan Demand response compensation, net Benefits and cost allocation: comments , 2010 .

[8]  Dan Rosen,et al.  Risk factor contributions in portfolio credit risk models , 2010 .

[9]  M. Haghifam,et al.  A demand response based solution for LMP management in power markets , 2011 .

[10]  Hanne Sæle,et al.  Demand Response From Household Customers: Experiences From a Pilot Study in Norway , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  D. Hunter Measuring marginal risk contributions in credit portfolios , 2006 .

[12]  K. Gillingham,et al.  Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2013, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[13]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  Daniel Kirschen,et al.  Allocating the cost of demand response compensation in wholesale energy markets , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[15]  R. Walawalkar,et al.  Evolution and current status of demand response (DR) in electricity markets: Insights from PJM and NYISO , 2010 .

[16]  P. Cappers,et al.  Demand Response in U.S. Electricity Markets: Empirical Evidence , 2010 .