ANYexo: A Versatile and Dynamic Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot

This letter presents a versatile upper-limb exoskeleton based on low-impedance torque controllable series elastic actuators. This experimental platform is designed to validate novel algorithms and hardware concepts for more autonomous therapy of moderately and severely affected patients with a neural impairment. The design is optimized to achieve a large range of motion (ROM) and robust interaction force control to best mimic the compliant and accurate haptic interaction of therapists. The presented robot covers the relevant ROM required for activities of daily life (ADL) particularly, including poses close to the torso, head, and behind the back. The kinematics are optimized for high manipulability during ADL and low inertia. We use modified modular series elastic actuators that provide the required power and torque control performance. We demonstrate highly transparent behavior up to speeds of 11 rad/s with a feed-forward torque controller based on an accurate dynamic model. The presented robot unites a large ROM with optimized manipulability, high nominal power to weight ratio (111 W/kg), accurate torque control at speeds sufficient for unconstrained recovery of patients, and versatility for a broad variety of experiments in one device. To our knowledge, no other device is tailored to such an extent for this application.

[1]  Lois H Thomas,et al.  Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke: A Major Update of a Cochrane Review , 2017, Stroke.

[2]  George K. I. Mann,et al.  Developments in hardware systems of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: A review , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Claysson Bruno Santos Vimieiro,et al.  Effectiveness of robot therapy on body function and structure in people with limited upper limb function: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, PloS one.

[5]  Jerry Pratt,et al.  Series elastic actuators for high fidelity force control , 2002 .

[6]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Comparing Series Elasticity and Admittance Control for Haptic Rendering , 2016, EuroHaptics.

[7]  Jens Bo Nielsen,et al.  Science-Based Neurorehabilitation: Recommendations for Neurorehabilitation From Basic Science , 2015, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  Jason M Wilken,et al.  Range of Motion Requirements for Upper-Limb Activities of Daily Living. , 2015, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  LIMPACT:A Hydraulically Powered Self-Aligning Upper Limb Exoskeleton , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[10]  Jagmahender Singh Sehrawat,et al.  Variability in anatomical features of human clavicle: Its forensic anthropological and clinical significance , 2016 .

[11]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  Bongsu Kim,et al.  An upper-body rehabilitation exoskeleton Harmony with an anatomical shoulder mechanism: Design, modeling, control, and performance evaluation , 2017, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Michelle J. Johnson,et al.  Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[14]  Sameer Nagda,et al.  Defining functional shoulder range of motion for activities of daily living. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Robert Riener,et al.  Comfort of two shoulder actuation mechanisms for arm therapy exoskeletons: a comparative study in healthy subjects , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  Peter Fankhauser,et al.  Perception-less terrain adaptation through whole body control and hierarchical optimization , 2016, 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[18]  Claude Desnuelle,et al.  Development of a French isometric strength normative database for adults using quantitative muscle testing. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Agnes Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  T. L. Brooks,et al.  Telerobotic response requirements , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[21]  Robert Riener,et al.  Exoskeleton transparency: feed-forward compensation vs. disturbance observer , 2018, Autom..

[22]  Peter Fankhauser,et al.  ANYmal - a highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[23]  Martin Buss,et al.  Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[24]  Arno H. A. Stienen,et al.  Visualization of shoulder range of motion for clinical diagnostics and device development , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[25]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin III --arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation , 2009 .

[26]  N. Manning,et al.  The human arm kinematics and dynamics during daily activities - toward a 7 DOF upper limb powered exoskeleton , 2005, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005..