Alternative operation models for using a feed‐in terminal as a part of the forest chip supply system for a CHP plant

The fuel supply of forest chips has to adapt to the annual fluctuations of power and heat generation. This creates inefficiency and unbalances the capacity utilization of the fuel supply fleet in the direct fuel supplies from roadside storages to power and heat generation. Terminals can offer an alternative approach for the fleet management of fuel supplies in terms of smoothing the unbalanced fleet use towards more even year‐round operations. The aim of the study was to compare the supply costs of a conventional direct forest chip supply to an alternative fuel supply with the use of a feed‐in terminal using the discrete‐event simulation method. The influences of the terminal location, terminal investment cost, outbound terminal transport method, terminal truck utilization and quality changes of terminal‐stored forest chips for the fuel supply cost were studied in the case environment. By introducing a feed‐in terminal and a shuttle truck for the transports of terminal‐stored forest chips, the total supply cost was 1.4% higher than the direct fuel supply scenario. In terminal scenarios, the supply costs increased 1–2% if the cost of the terminal investment increased 30%, the distance to the terminal increased from 5 to 30 km or the total annual use of a terminal truck decreased 1500 h. Moreover, a 1 per cent point per month increase in the dry matter loss of terminal‐stored chips increased the total supply cost 1%. The study revealed that with the relatively low additional cost, the feed‐in terminal can be introduced to the conventional forest chip supply. Cost compensation can be gained through the higher annual use of a fuel supply fleet and more secured fuel supply to power plants by decreasing the need for supplement fuel, which can be more expensive at a time of the highest fuel demand.

[1]  J F Glenn,et al.  Prospects and challenges. , 1967, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Kalle Karttunen,et al.  Cost-efficiency of intermodal container supply chain for forest chips. , 2013 .

[3]  O. Korpinen,et al.  Cost analysis of a satellite terminal for forest fuel supply in Finland , 2016 .

[4]  Kalvis Kons,et al.  Forest biomass terminal propertiesand activities , 2015 .

[5]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Industrial supply chains and production machinery of forest chips in Finland , 2011 .

[6]  Rien Visser,et al.  Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. , 2009 .

[7]  L. Sikanen,et al.  Dry matter losses , 2016 .

[8]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Regional energy wood logistics - optimizing local fuel supply. , 2009 .

[9]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Assessing chipper productivity and operator effects in forest biomass operations. , 2015 .

[10]  Raida Jirjis,et al.  Effects of particle size and pile height on storage and fuel quality of comminuted Salix viminalis , 2005 .

[11]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Current state and development possibilities of wood chip supply chains in Austria , 2006 .

[12]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Characteristics of Swedish forest biomass terminals for energy , 2014 .

[13]  Juha Nurmi,et al.  The storage of logging residue for fuel , 1999 .

[14]  Ulrich J. Wolfsmayr,et al.  The primary forest fuel supply chain: a literature review. , 2014 .

[15]  Johanna Routa,et al.  Precision measurement of forest harvesting residue moisture change and dry matter losses by constant weight monitoring , 2015 .

[16]  Lauri Sikanen,et al.  Discrete-event simulation of an information-based raw material allocation process for increasing the efficiency of an energy wood supply chain , 2015 .

[17]  Teijo Palander,et al.  Prospects and Challenges of Timber Trucking in a Changing Operational Environment in Finland , 2014 .

[18]  Jaakko Heinonen,et al.  Characteristics and time consumption of timber trucking in Finland , 2007 .

[19]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Improving the efficiency of forest fuel supply chains , 2016 .

[20]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Forest energy procurement: state of the art in Finland and Sweden , 2013 .

[21]  Ville Hankalin,et al.  Solid biomass fuel terminal concepts and a cost analysis of a satellite terminal concept , 2015 .

[22]  Teijo Palander,et al.  Modelling fuel terminals for supplying a combined heat and power (CHP) plant with forest biomass in Finland , 2013 .

[23]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Efficiency of Integrated Grinding and Screening of Stump Wood for Fuel at Roadside Landing with a Low-Speed Double-Shaft Grinder and a Star Screen , 2015 .