What’s the state of energy studies research?: A content analysis of three leading journals from 1999 to 2008

We present the results of a content analysis conducted on 2502 papers written by 5318 authors published between 1999 and 2008 in three leading energy studies journals: Energy Policy, The Energy Journal, and The Electricity Journal. Our study finds that authors were most likely to be male, based in North America, possess a background in science or engineering, and affiliated with a university or research institute. Articles were likely to be written by authors working within disciplinary boundaries and using research methods from an economics/engineering background. The US was the most written about country among papers that adopted a country focus and electricity was the most frequently discussed energy source. Energy markets and public policy instruments were the most popular focus areas. According to these findings, we identify five thematic areas whose further investigation could enhance the energy studies field and increase the policy-relevance of contemporary research.

[1]  Paavo Pelkonen,et al.  Bio-energy in China: Content analysis of news articles on Chinese professional internet platforms , 2009 .

[2]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[3]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Analysis of the energy access improvement and its socio-economic impacts in rural areas of developing countries , 2007 .

[4]  Nina E. Lerman,et al.  Gender and Technology: a Reader , 2003 .

[5]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2009 , 2000 .

[6]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Who governs energy? The challenges facing global energy governance , 2009 .

[7]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[8]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[9]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[10]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[11]  John M. McCann,et al.  Assessing Communication Effects on Energy Conservation , 1978 .

[12]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[13]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue , 1996 .

[15]  E. Shove,et al.  Contracting knowledge: the organizational limits to interdisciplinary energy efficiency research and development in the US and the UK , 1999 .

[16]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Rejecting Renewables: The Socio-Technical Impediments to Renewable Electricity in the United States , 2008, Renewable Energy.

[17]  S. S. Chandel,et al.  Review of Improved Cookstoves Programme in Western Himalayan State of India , 2004 .

[18]  S. E. Muneer,et al.  Adoption of biomass improved cookstoves in a patriarchal society: an example from Sudan. , 2003 .

[19]  Jamal Saghir.  Energy and poverty: myths, links, and policy issues , 2005 .

[20]  Les Carlson,et al.  A Content Analysis of Environmental Advertising Claims: A Matrix Method Approach , 1993 .

[21]  M. Subramaniam.  Whose Interests? , 2000 .

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Bob Hancké.  Intelligent Research Design: A Guide for Beginning Researchers in the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[24]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[25]  Patrik Thollander,et al.  An interdisciplinary perspective on industrial energy efficiency , 2010 .

[26]  Lyle V. Jones,et al.  SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES , 1982 .

[27]  H. Lacey,et al.  The Gender and Science Reader , 2004 .