Ethical Considerations of Applying Robots in Kindergarten Settings: Towards an Approach from a Macroperspective

In child–robot interaction (cHRI) research, many studies pursue the goal to develop interactive systems that can be applied in everyday settings. For early education, increasingly, the setting of a kindergarten is targeted. However, when cHRI and research are brought into a kindergarten, a range of ethical and related procedural aspects have to be considered and dealt with. While ethical models elaborated within other human–robot interaction settings, e.g., assisted living contexts, can provide some important indicators for relevant issues, we argue that it is important to start developing a systematic approach to identify and tackle those ethical issues which rise with cHRI in kindergarten settings on a more global level and address the impact of the technology from a macroperspective beyond the effects on the individual. Based on our experience in conducting studies with children in general and pedagogical considerations on the role of the institution of kindergarten in specific, in this paper, we enfold some relevant aspects that have barely been addressed in an explicit way in current cHRI research. Four areas are analyzed and key ethical issues are identified in each area: (1) the institutional setting of a kindergarten, (2) children as a vulnerable group, (3) the caregivers’ role, and (4) pedagogical concepts. With our considerations, we aim at (i) broadening the methodology of the current studies within the area of cHRI, (ii) revalidate it based on our comprehensive empirical experience with research in kindergarten settings, both laboratory and real-world contexts, and (iii) provide a framework for the development of a more systematic approach to address the ethical issues in cHRI research within kindergarten settings.

[1]  S. Levinson Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  A Survey of Expectations About the Role of Robots in Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[3]  Katharina J. Rohlfing,et al.  The caregiver’s role in keeping a child–robot interaction going , 2020 .

[4]  Fabio Tesser,et al.  Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds , 2013, HRI 2013.

[5]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Exploring the design space of robots: Children's perspectives , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Daniela Conti,et al.  “Robot, tell me a tale!” , 2020 .

[7]  Hae Won Park,et al.  Flat vs. Expressive Storytelling: Young Children’s Learning and Retention of a Social Robot’s Narrative , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  G. Doherty-Sneddon,et al.  Visual signals and the communication abilities of children. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[9]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Understanding the link between joint attention and language. , 1995 .

[11]  J. Panel Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2013 .

[12]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  How to Build a Supervised Autonomous System for Robot-Enhanced Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2017, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[13]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Managing chaos: models of turn-taking in character-multichild interactions , 2013, ICMI '13.

[14]  L. Hewitt,et al.  'What did you say'?: understanding conversational breakdowns in children with speech and language impairments , 2002, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[15]  Angela D. Evans,et al.  Apologies repair children's trust: The mediating role of emotions. , 2018, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  Hui Yu,et al.  Robot-Enhanced Therapy: Development and Validation of Supervised Autonomous Robotic System for Autism Spectrum Disorders Therapy , 2019, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[17]  J. Belsky,et al.  Are there long-term effects of early child care? , 2007, Child development.

[18]  C. Kemner,et al.  Spatial Frequency Training Modulates Neural Face Processing: Learning Transfers from Low- to High-Level Visual Features , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity , 2018, Science Robotics.

[20]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Dominique-Pascal Groß Lead User in der Medical Homecare-Industrie in Deutschland , 2017 .

[22]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.

[23]  Helen F. Hastie,et al.  Teachers' views on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[24]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  When Children Teach a Robot to Write: An Autonomous Teachable Humanoid Which Uses Simulated Handwriting , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  J. Kanero,et al.  Social robots for early language learning: Current evidence and future directionsijdschrift Approachvan dencal practice: A pilot study.uali , 2018 .

[26]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Learning verbs by teaching a care-receiving robot by children: An experimental report , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Katharina J. Rohlfing,et al.  Preschoolers' engagement in social interaction with an autonomous robotic system , 2016, 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob).

[28]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  The Impact of Robot Tutor Nonverbal Social Behavior on Child Learning , 2017, Front. ICT.

[30]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Should we welcome robot teachers? , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[31]  Mikael B. Skov,et al.  A review of research methods in children's technology design , 2005, IDC '05.

[32]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Affective Personalization of a Social Robot Tutor for Children's Second Language Skills , 2016, AAAI.

[33]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Lessons from teachers on performing HRI studies with young children in schools , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[34]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Young Children Treat Robots as Informants , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Hsien-Sheng Hsiao,et al.  “iRobiQ”: the influence of bidirectional interaction on kindergarteners’ reading motivation, literacy, and behavior , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[36]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child Speech Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: Evaluations and Recommendations , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[37]  H. Foot,et al.  Pre-school Education: Parents' preferences, knowledge and expectations Enseignement Prescolaire: Preferences, connaissances et attentes des parent Educacio´n Preescolar: Preferencias, conocimiento y expectativas de los padres , 2000 .

[38]  Omar Mubin,et al.  Adaptive Social Robot for Sustaining Social Engagement during Long-Term Children–Robot Interaction , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  Cathy Nutbrown Key Concepts in Early Childhood Education and Care , 2005 .

[40]  Dickson K. W. Chiu,et al.  Requirements elicitation for the design of context-aware applications in a ubiquitous environment , 2005, ICEC '05.

[41]  Aude Billard,et al.  Safety issues in human-robot interactions , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[42]  Xiaofeng Liu,et al.  Human Robot Collaborative Intelligence , 2019, Interaction Studies.

[43]  Elena Nicoladis,et al.  Talking with strangers: A study of bilingual children's communicative competence , 1996, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[44]  Daniel P. Davison,et al.  Towards a child-robot symbiotic co-development: a theoretical approach , 2015, HRI 2015.

[45]  Sofia Serholt,et al.  Breakdowns in children's interactions with a robotic tutor: A longitudinal study , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Psychophysiological experimental design for use in human-robot interaction studies , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[47]  Jan de Wit,et al.  A Robot Teaching Young Children a Second Language: The Effect of Multiple Interactions on Engagement and Performance , 2018, HRI.

[48]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[49]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Gerhard Sagerer,et al.  Understanding Social Robots , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[51]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Conformity to peer pressure in preschool children. , 2011, Child development.

[52]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf An Ethical Evaluation of Human–Robot Relationships , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[53]  Emily J. Ashurst,et al.  Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning , 2017, PloS one.

[54]  I. Samuelsson,et al.  Early childhood education and learning for sustainable development and citizenship , 2009 .

[55]  Emily C. Collins,et al.  Don't Worry, We'll Get There: Developing Robot Personalities to Maintain User Interaction After Robot Error , 2016, Living Machines.

[56]  Annie M. Moses Impacts of television viewing on young children's literacy development in the USA: A review of the literature , 2008 .

[57]  P. Williams Preschool Routines, Peer Learning and Participation , 2001 .