Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke.

OBJECTIVE To assess the reliability of 6 gait performance tests in individuals with chronic mild to moderate post-stroke hemiparesis. DESIGN An intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. SUBJECTS Fifty men and women (mean age 58+/-6.4 years) 6-46 months post-stroke. METHODS The Timed "Up & Go" test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, the Stair Climbing ascend and descend tests and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)), the Bland & Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%). RESULTS Test-retest agreements were high (ICC(2,1) 0.94-0.99) with no discernible systematic differences between the tests. The standard error of measurement (SEM%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (< 9%). The smallest real difference (SRD%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual, was also small (13-23%). CONCLUSION These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in individuals with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.

[1]  V. Seagroatt.  An introduction to medical statistics (2nd ed.) , 1996 .

[2]  M. Greenwood.  An Introduction to Medical Statistics , 1932, Nature.

[3]  M. Kh,et al.  Gait training in hemiplegia. , 2002 .

[4]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[6]  M. Stokes,et al.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Downham,et al.  Ankle dorsiflexor muscle performance in healthy young men and women: reliability of eccentric peak torque and work measurements. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[9]  Graham Lawton,et al.  Get up and go , 2006 .

[10]  Heleen Beckerman,et al.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness , 2001, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  William J. Rogers,et al.  Prediction of Mortality and Morbidity With a 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 1993 .

[12]  D. Wade,et al.  Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  U S Nayak,et al.  Balance in elderly patients: the "get-up and go" test. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  D. Wade,et al.  Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. , 1990, International disability studies.

[16]  S L Wolf,et al.  Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile: An Outcome Measure for the Rehabilitation of Poststroke Gait Dysfunction , 2001, Stroke.

[17]  J. Fleiss.  The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[18]  J. Gladman,et al.  The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation. , 1997, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[20]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  S J Jay,et al.  Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. , 2000 .

[22]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Gait training in hemiplegia. , 2002, European journal of neurology.

[23]  P. van Vliet,et al.  Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[24]  C. Richards,et al.  Gait in stroke: assessment and rehabilitation. , 1999, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[25]  Bittner,et al.  Prediction of mortality and morbidity with a 6-minute walk test in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. SOLVD Investigators. , 1993, JAMA.

[26]  K. Cooper.  A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. Correlation between field and treadmill testing. , 1968, JAMA.

[27]  P. Goldie,et al.  Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Richard W. Bohannon.  Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[30]  C. Terwee,et al.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[31]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF Core Sets for stroke. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[33]  M M Porter,et al.  Reliability of isokinetic ankle dorsiflexor strength measurements in healthy young men and women. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[34]  S Higuchi,et al.  Physical Performance Tests After Stroke: Reliability and Validity , 2000, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[35]  C. Richards,et al.  Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  D. Wade,et al.  Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[37]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[38]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical Gait Assessment in the Neurologically Impaired , 1984 .

[39]  A. Woodcock,et al.  Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. , 1982, British medical journal.

[40]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  Exercise and Training to Optimize Functional Motor Performance in Stroke: Driving Neural Reorganization? , 2001, Neural plasticity.

[41]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Functional Walk Tests in Individuals With Stroke: Relation to Perceived Exertion and Myocardial Exertion , 2002, Stroke.

[42]  Anne Forster,et al.  Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[43]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. , 1984, Thorax.

[44]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Sample size requirements for reliability studies. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  P. Goldie,et al.  Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[47]  P. Goldie,et al.  Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.