Glasgow Gloom or Leeds Glue? Dialect-Specific Vowel Duration Constrains Lexical Segmentation and Access

Timing cues are important in many aspects of speech processing, fromidentifying segments to locating word and phrase boundaries. They vary across accents, yet representation and processing of this variation are poorly understood. We investigated whether an accent difference in vowel duration affects lexical segmentation and access. In Glasgow English (GE), /i u e o/ are shorter than in Leeds English (LE), especially for /i u/ before voiced stops and nasals. In a word-spotting experiment, GE and LE participants heard nonsense sequences (e.g. pobegloomezh) containing embedded words (gloom, glue), with segmental qualities intermediate between GE and LE. Critical vowel durations were manipulated according to accent (GE-appropriate vowels shorter than LE-appropriate ones) and phonological context (vowels shortest before voiceless stops < voiced stops/nasals < voiced fricatives). GE participants generally spotted words like gloom more accurately with GE-appropriate than LE-appropriate vowels. LE participants were less accurate than GE participants to spot words like gloom with GE-appropriate vowels, but more likely to spot embeddings like glue. These results were broadly as predicted based on the accent differences, but depended less than expected on the accent-specific phonological constraints. We discuss theoretical implications regarding the representation of duration and the time course of lexical access.

[1]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[2]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  The next toolkit , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[3]  Sara Finley,et al.  Artificial language learning and feature-based generalization , 2009 .

[4]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[5]  G. Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[6]  John C. Wells,et al.  Accents of English , 1982 .

[7]  J. Devin McAuley,et al.  Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  polysp: a polysystemic, phonetically-rich approach to speech understanding , 2001 .

[9]  François Pellegrino,et al.  The Perception of a Derived Contrast in Scottish English , 2011, ICPhS.

[10]  François Grosjean,et al.  Dialect Effects in Speech Perception: The Role of Vowel Duration in Parisian French and Swiss French , 2011, Language and speech.

[11]  J. Fletcher The Prosody of Speech: Timing and Rhythm , 2010 .

[12]  A. Samuel,et al.  The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants , 2009 .

[13]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Perception of Dialect Variation in Noise: Intelligibility and Classification , 2008, Language and speech.

[14]  P. Kerswill Children, adolescents, and language change , 1996, Language Variation and Change.

[15]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Regional and Foreign Accent Processing in English: Can Listeners Adapt? , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  S Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance. , 1986, Psychological review.

[19]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Spectral and duration properties of front vowels as cues to final stop-consonant voicing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Pauline Welby,et al.  The role of early fundamental frequency rises and elbows in French word segmentation , 2007, Speech Commun..

[21]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D. Scott,et al.  Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure. , 1984 .

[23]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Phonetic variation as communicative system: Perception of the particular and the abstract , 2007 .

[24]  J. McQueen Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[25]  S G Nooteboom,et al.  Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. , 1980, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  R. Gregg,et al.  The diphthongs əi and a1 in Scottish, Scotch-Irish and Canadian English , 1973, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[27]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[28]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[29]  François Pellegrino,et al.  Derived Contrasts in Scottish English: An EEG Study , 2011, ICPhS.

[30]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[31]  P. Trudgill Dialects in contact , 1986 .

[32]  S. Scott,et al.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Emmanuel Ferragne,et al.  Formant frequencies of vowels in 13 accents of the British Isles , 2010, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[34]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  B. Lobanov Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers , 1971 .

[36]  Bill Wells,et al.  Can children with speech difficulties process an unfamiliar accent? , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[37]  D. Norris,et al.  The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  D. Scott,et al.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[40]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[41]  I. Lehiste,et al.  Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences , 1975 .

[42]  Nikolas Coupland,et al.  Dialects in Contact , 1988 .

[43]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[44]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Multilevel Exemplar Theory , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing , 2008 .

[47]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .

[48]  Laurence White,et al.  Structural and dialectal effects on pitch peak alignment in two varieties of British English , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[49]  M. Pitt,et al.  Word length and lexical activation: longer is better. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  W. A. Ainsworth,et al.  Duration as a Cue in the Recognition of Synthetic Vowels , 1972 .

[51]  J. Scobbie,et al.  Quasi-phonemic contrast and the fuzzy inventory: examples from Scottish English , 2008 .

[52]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Spectral tilt as a cue to word segmentation in infancy and adulthood , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Sophie Dufour,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the impact of regional variation on phoneme perception , 2009, Cognition.

[54]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Phonetic variation as communicative system: Perception of the particular and the abstract , 2010 .

[56]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[57]  J L Miller,et al.  Dialect Effects in Vowel Perception: The Role of Temporal Information in French , 1997, Language and speech.

[58]  Roel Smits,et al.  A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  R. Schreuder,et al.  Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[60]  R. Knight,et al.  Cross-Accent Intelligibility of Speech in Noise: Long-Term Familiarity and Short-Term Familiarization , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  C Donlan,et al.  Children's comprehension of unfamiliar regional accents: a preliminary investigation , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[62]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Effects on word recognition of syllable-onset cues to syllable-coda voicing , 2004 .

[63]  Charles Jones,et al.  The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language , 1997 .

[64]  Sandra Schwab,et al.  Effect of Speaking Rate on the Identification of Word Boundaries , 2008, Phonetica.

[65]  Terrin N. Tamati,et al.  Lexical neighborhoods and phonological confusability in cross-dialect word recognition in noise , 2010 .

[66]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Learning the mapping from surface to underlying representations in an artificial language , 2006 .

[67]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[68]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Lexical segmentation in TRACE: an exercise in simulation , 1991 .

[69]  P. Mermelstein,et al.  On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[70]  Jan Edwards,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency , 1990 .

[71]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[72]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Production and perception of speaker-specific phonetic detail at word boundaries , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[73]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[74]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[75]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Vowel duration in Scottish English speaking children , 1999 .

[76]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic linguistics : essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged , 1987 .

[77]  Jane Stuart-Smith,et al.  Scottish English: phonology , 2020, A Handbook of Varieties of English.

[78]  Robert Bayley,et al.  Language Variety in the South Revisited , 2014 .

[79]  D. Dahan,et al.  Context-conditioned generalization in adaptation to distorted speech. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  W. Strange,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[81]  J. Stuart-Smith The phonology of modern urban Scots , 2003 .

[82]  Douglas H. Whalen,et al.  Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information , 1989 .

[83]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[84]  Sophie Dufour,et al.  Regional differences in the listener’s phonemic inventory affect semantic processing: A mismatch negativity (MMN) study , 2011, Brain and Language.

[85]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[86]  Sahyang Kim,et al.  The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[87]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Standard English in Edinburgh and Glasgow: the Scottish vowel length rule revealed. , 1999 .

[88]  J. Stuart-Smith Glasgow: accent and voice quality , 1999 .

[89]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[90]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[91]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[92]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Adaptation to Novel Accents: Feature-Based Learning of Context-Sensitive Phonological Regularities , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[93]  R Berkovits,et al.  Durational Effects in Final Lengthening, Gapping, and Contrastive Stress , 1994, Language and speech.

[94]  A. House,et al.  The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels , 1953 .

[95]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception and Implicit Memory: Evidence for Detailed Episodic Encoding of Phonetic Events 1 , 2000 .