Image Registration for Interventional MRI Guided Procedures: Interpolation Methods, Similarity Measurements, and Applications to the Prostate

Nuclear medicine can detect and localize tumor in the prostate not reliably seen in MR. We are investigating methods to combine the advantages of SPECT with interventional MRI (iMRI) guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of the prostate. Our approach is to first register the low-resolution functional images with a high resolution MR volume. Then, by combining the high-resolution MR image with live-time iMRI acquisitions, we can, in turn, include the functional data and high-resolution anatomic information into the iMRI system for improved tumor targeting. In this study, we investigated registration methods for combining noisy, thick iMRI image slices with high-resolution MR volumes. We compared three similarity measures, i.e., normalized mutual information, mutual information, and correlation coefficient; and three interpolation methods, i.e., re-normalized sinc, tri-linear, and nearest neighbor. Registration experiments showed that transverse slice images covering the prostate work best with a registration error of ≈ 0.5 mm as compared to our volume-to-volume registration that was previously shown to be quite accurate for these image pairs.

[1]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[2]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[3]  G. Bakale,et al.  Multicenter ProstaScint imaging findings in 2154 patients with prostate cancer. The ProstaScint Imaging Centers. , 2000, Urology.

[4]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[5]  N A Thacker,et al.  Improved quality of re‐sliced MR images using re‐normalized sinc interpolation , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[7]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[8]  A Collignon,et al.  Automated multimodality image registration using information theory , 1995 .

[9]  David L. Wilson,et al.  Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  A. Macovski Noise in MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  David L Wilson,et al.  Automatic 3D registration for interventional MRI-guided treatment of prostate cancer. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[13]  Robert Nowak,et al.  Noise removal methods for high resolution MRI , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[15]  J. Hajnal,et al.  A Registration and Interpolation Procedure for Subvoxel Matching of Serially Acquired MR Images , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Jonathan S. Lewin,et al.  Slice-to-volume registration and its potential application to interventional MRI-guided radio-frequency thermal ablation of prostate cancer , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.