Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice

Osteoporotic fracture incidence and underlying risk factors like low peak bone mass are heritable, but the genetic basis of osteoporosis remains poorly understood. Based on beam theory, stating that mechanical properties of a structure depend on both the amount and quality of the constituent materials, we investigated the relationship between whole bone mechanical properties and a set of morphological and compositional traits in femurs of eight inbred mouse strains. K-means cluster analysis revealed that individual femora could be classified reliably according to genotype based on the combination of bone area (tissue amount), moment of inertia (tissue distribution), and ash content (tissue quality). This trait combination explained 66–88% of the inter-strain variability in four whole-bone mechanical properties that describe all aspects of the failure process, including measures of brittleness. Stiffness and maximum load were functionally associated with cortical area, while measures of brittleness were associated with ash content. In contrast, work-to-failure was not directly related to a single trait but depended on a combination of trait magnitudes. From these findings, which were entirely consistent with established mechanical theory, we developed a hierarchical paradigm relating the mechanical properties that define bone fragility with readily measurable phenotypic traits that exhibit strong heritability. This paradigm will help guide the search for genes that underlie fracture susceptibility and osteoporosis. Moreover, because the traits we examined are measurable with non-invasive means, this approach may also prove directly applicable to osteoporosis risk assessment.

[1]  L. Donahue,et al.  Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice. , 1996, Bone.

[2]  S. Cummings,et al.  Family History and Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  G A Churchill,et al.  Quantitative Trait Loci for Femoral and Lumbar Vertebral Bone Mineral Density in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ Inbred Strains of Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  R. Recker,et al.  Bone Response to In Vivo Mechanical Loading in Two Breeds of Mice , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[5]  M. Peterson,et al.  Bone Strength and Related Traits in HcB/Dem Recombinant Congenic Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  D. E. Pennington,et al.  Bone Brittleness Varies with Genetic Background in A/J and C57BL/6J Inbred Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  S. Cummings,et al.  Family history and risk of osteoporotic fracture. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1998, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[8]  S. P. Nielsen,et al.  The Fallacy of BMD: A Critical Review of the Diagnostic Use of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry , 2000, Clinical Rheumatology.

[9]  R. Capozza,et al.  Long-bone biomechanics in mice selected for body conformation. , 1997, Bone.

[10]  J. Christian,et al.  Genetic factors in determining bone mass. , 1973, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  J S Thomsen,et al.  Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing. , 1999, Bone.

[12]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  The role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar spine and proximal femur in the diagnosis and follow-up of osteoporosis. , 1995, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  L. Donahue,et al.  Defining the Genetics of Osteoporosis: Using the Mouse to Understand Man , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  K. Jepsen,et al.  Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything. , 2001, Bone.

[15]  J. Zanchetta,et al.  Interrelationships between densitometric, geometric, and mechanical properties of rat femora: Inferences concerning mechanical regulation of bone modeling , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  E. Orwoll,et al.  Phenotypic Characterization of Mice Bred for High and Low Peak Bone Mass , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Chromosomal regions harboring genes for the work to femur failure in mice , 2002, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[18]  R. Recker,et al.  Relevance of the genes for bone mass variation to susceptibility to osteoporotic fractures and its implications to gene search for complex human diseases , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[19]  A. Boskey Biomineralization: Conflicts, challenges, and opportunities , 1998, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[20]  J. Currey,et al.  Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical properties of bone. , 1984, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  R. Recker,et al.  Genetic Variations in Bone Density, Histomorphometry, and Strength in Mice , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  Matthew J. Silva,et al.  Growing C57Bl/6 Mice Increase Whole Bone Mechanical Properties by Increasing Geometric and Material Properties , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  G. Beaupré,et al.  The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. , 2001, Bone.

[24]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Type‐I collagen mutation compromises the post‐yield behavior of Mov13 long bone , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[26]  R Müller,et al.  Variation in Bone Biomechanical Properties, Microstructure, and Density in BXH Recombinant Inbred Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.