A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy

This paper reports on the development and evaluation of a software program aimed at assisting children with phonological impairment. An experimental approach was used whereby children's speech output was assessed pre- and post-therapy. Children were randomly assigned to a computer, a tabletop or a no therapy group. Those children receiving the computer therapy were exposed to an experimental software program that mirrored the tabletop activities using interactive computer games. The results showed no significant difference between any of the three groups with regard to change in speech output. These results may relate to the amount and frequency of therapy given and also to the heterogeneous nature of children included in the study. There was considerable variation in individual performance across all three groups and the data were therefore analysed to look for patterns that might predict performance. Stimulability and gender were identified as possible predictors. Female children and those who were able to produce a greater number of consonant speech sounds in isolation were more likely to make progress in their speech output. Future research might use a similar methodology to compare the therapy conditions but with a more homogenous group in terms of stimulability and using a greater intensity of intervention.

[1]  Joy Stackhouse,et al.  Children's Speech and Literacy Difficulties: A Psycholinguistic Framework , 1997 .

[2]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Effectiveness of speech intervention for phonological disorders: a randomized controlled trial , 1998, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[3]  D. Sherman,et al.  Review of Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. , 1970 .

[4]  L. Shriberg,et al.  Phonological disorders III: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  J. Gierut,et al.  Treatment efficacy: functional phonological disorders in children. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  E. S. Klein Phonological/Traditional Approaches to Articulation Therapy , 1996 .

[7]  L. Shriberg,et al.  Articulation testing by microcomputer. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[8]  R. Katz,et al.  Computerized hierarchical reading treatment in aphasia , 1992 .

[9]  A. Hesketh,et al.  Phonological awareness therapy and articulatory training approaches for children with phonological disorders: a comparative outcome study. , 2000, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[10]  G. Gillon,et al.  Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. , 2002, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[11]  S. Rvachew,et al.  The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  R. Katz,et al.  The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  L O'Connor,et al.  A comparison of microcomputer-aided and traditional language therapy for developing communication skills in nonoral toddlers. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[14]  Svein Eikeseth,et al.  Behavioral treatment of children with phonological disorder: the efficacy of vocal imitation and sufficient-response-exemplar training. , 2003, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  James Law,et al.  The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  B. Dodd,et al.  A comparison of three therapy methods for children with different types of developmental phonological disorder. , 2000, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[17]  V. Wolfe,et al.  The importance of sound identification training in phonological intervention. , 2003, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[18]  Geneviève Cloutier,et al.  Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay. , 2004, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[19]  B. Dodd,et al.  Phonological systems of a set of Putonghua-speaking twins. , 2000, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[20]  Teris K. Schery,et al.  The Effectiveness of School-Based Computer Language Intervention With Severely Handicapped Children , 1992 .

[21]  R. Grieve,et al.  The effectiveness of therapy for child phonological disorder: the metaphon approach , 1994 .

[22]  P. Hook,et al.  Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties—A longitudinal study , 2001 .

[23]  S. B. Chin,et al.  Generalization to conversational speech. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[24]  G. A. Troia,et al.  A close look at the efficacy of Fast ForWord Language for children with academic weaknesses , 2003 .

[25]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: Evaluation of clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction , 2002 .

[26]  J. Gierut,et al.  Differential learning of phonological oppositions. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  L. Shriberg,et al.  Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: response evocation phase. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[28]  F. Loverso,et al.  Microcomputer treatment applications in aphasiology , 1992 .

[29]  Edna Carter Young The Effects of Treatment on Consonant Cluster and Weak Syllable Reduction Processes in Misarticulating Children. , 1987 .

[30]  Susan Rvachew,et al.  Stimulability, Speech Perception Skills, and the Treatment of Phonological Disorders , 1999 .

[31]  R. Gillam,et al.  Language Change Following Computer-Assisted Language Instruction with Fast ForWord or Laureate Learning Systems Software. , 2001 .

[32]  James Boyle,et al.  Effects of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (Fast ForWord) in severe mixed receptive-expressive language impairment: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[33]  B. Dodd,et al.  Phonological disorders in children: changes in phonological process use during treatment. , 1989, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[34]  Barbara Dodd,et al.  The Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Children With Speech Disorder , 1995 .

[35]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Computer-based training of language production: An exploratory study , 2001 .

[36]  R. Wertz,et al.  Promoting recovery in chronic aphasia with an interactive technology. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[38]  G. Gillon,et al.  The Efficacy of Phonological Awareness Intervention for Children With Spoken Language Impairment. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[39]  T. W. Powell Phonetic inventory constraints in young children: Factors affecting acquisition patterns during treatment , 1993 .

[40]  C. Bowen,et al.  Parents and children together (PACT): a collaborative approach to phonological therapy. , 1999, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[41]  Alison Holm,et al.  Intervention for children with severe speech disorder: a comparison of two approaches. , 2005, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[42]  D Howard,et al.  Frozen phonology thawed: the analysis and remediation of a developmental disorder of real word phonology. , 1992, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[43]  J. Adrián,et al.  CASE STUDY The use of computer‐assisted therapy in anomia rehabilitation: A single‐case report , 2003 .

[44]  J. Smith,et al.  Can phonological awareness training facilitate minimal pair therapy? , 1998, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[45]  S Roulstone,et al.  Investigation of theoretical models and therapy activities: phonological difficulties. , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[46]  Pam Enderby,et al.  An investigation into the feasibility of remotely monitored computer therapy for people with aphasia , 2003 .

[47]  Dan Monahan Remediation of Common Phonological Processes: Four Case Studies , 1986 .

[48]  Vance Ma,et al.  Speech processing and short term memory in children with normal and atypical speech and language development. , 2001 .

[49]  T. Pring,et al.  Treating children with expressive phonological disorders: does phonological awareness therapy work in the clinic? , 2005, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[50]  Wren Ye An evaluation of the use of computers in phonology therapy. , 2005 .

[51]  S. French Professional Judgement: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making , 1989 .

[52]  J. Orme The Coloured Progressive Matrices as a measure of intellectual subnormality. , 1961, The British journal of medical psychology.

[53]  Judith A. Gierut,et al.  Phonological Treatment Efficacy and Developmental Norms , 1996 .

[54]  J. Halle,et al.  Phonological Awareness and Production: Changes During Intervention. , 1999, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[55]  J. Ingham,et al.  The effects of minimal pairs treatment on the speech-sound production of two children with phonologic disorders. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[56]  S. Rvachew Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[57]  K. Forrest,et al.  The Relationship Between Stimulability and Phonological Acquisition in Children With Normally Developing and Disordered Phonologies , 1999 .

[58]  J. Gierut The conditions and course of clinically induced phonological change. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[59]  L D Shriberg,et al.  Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: stabilization phase. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[60]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[61]  Christopher J. Lonigan,et al.  A Computer-Assisted Instruction Phonological Sensitivity Program for Preschool Children At-Risk for Reading Problems , 2003 .

[62]  F Weiner,et al.  Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: two case studies. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[63]  J. Masterson,et al.  Computer Technology: Creative Interfaces in Service Delivery , 1999 .

[64]  D. Dinnsen,et al.  Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[65]  Patricia J. Jamison,et al.  Phonological Awareness Intervention: Comparison of Fast ForWord, Earobics, and LiPS , 2004 .