Subjective Effects of Sound Absorption and Investigation of Reverberation Times in Modern Japanese Dwellings

This study aimed to reveal the influence of sound absorption in general dwellings on the subjective evaluation of acoustics. First, a subjective experiment was conducted using a full-scale room model. The results indicate that the feelings of silence and serenity can be experienced at absorption coefficients above 0.17, particularly above 0.25. Additionally, we used the recorded binaural sounds for a subjective test instead of using a full-scale room model. This trial showed that the reverberance, feeling of silence, and feeling of serenity can also be evaluated using a headphone listening test. We also measured the reverberation times and recorded the sound environments in three bedrooms, three living and dining (LD) rooms, and three child rooms in modern Japanese dwellings. The average absorption coefficients of the LD and child rooms were lower than 0.17, in the range of 500 Hz to 4 kHz. Therefore, we analyzed the subjective effect of absorption through a psychological test using binaural recorded sounds. The bedrooms with absorption coefficients of 0.18–0.23 were significantly less reverberant, quieter, and more serene than the other rooms.

[1]  Jian Kang,et al.  Development and testing of Indoor Soundscape Questionnaire for evaluating contextual experience in public spaces , 2017 .

[2]  David Oliva,et al.  Justification of standardized level differences in rating of airborne sound insulation between dwellings , 2016 .

[3]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Subjective evaluation of heavy-weight floor impact sounds in relation to spatial characteristics. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Nikolaos-Georgios Vardaxis,et al.  Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings—part I: Associations of acoustic field data to subjective responses from building surveys , 2018 .

[5]  Jian Kang,et al.  Analysing Sound Environment and Architectural Characteristics of Libraries through Indoor Soundscape Framework , 2016 .

[6]  Shin'ya Nagasawa,et al.  IMPROVEMENT OF THE SCHEFFÉ'S METHOD FOR PAIRED COMPARISONS , 2002 .

[7]  Marion Burgess,et al.  Reverberation times in British living rooms , 1985 .

[8]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Evaluation of floor impact sound insulation in reinforced concrete buildings , 2004 .

[9]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Evaluating airborne sound insulation in terms of speech intelligibility. , 2008, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W. E. Scholes,et al.  Field measurements of sound insulation between dwellings , 1960 .

[11]  Jun Nakatani,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF SOUND ABSORPTION FOR COMFORTABLE SOUND ENVIRONMENTS IN RESIDENCES , 2011 .

[12]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Carla Vlaskamp,et al.  The relationship between soundscapes and challenging behavior: A small-scale intervention study in a healthcare organization for individuals with severe or profound intellectual disabilities , 2018, Building Acoustics.

[14]  Francesco Babich,et al.  Acoustics for Supportive and Healthy Buildings: Emerging Themes on Indoor Soundscape Research , 2020 .

[15]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Annoyance caused by heavyweight floor impact sounds in relation to the autocorrelation function and sound quality metrics , 2008 .

[16]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF FLOOR IMPACT NOISE BASED ON THE MODEL OF ACF/IACF , 2001 .

[17]  F. Aletta,et al.  Soundscapes of buildings and built environments , 2018, Building Acoustics.

[18]  H. G. Leventhall,et al.  The acoustics of domestic rooms , 1972 .

[19]  Albatici,et al.  Assessment Methods and Factors Determining Positive Indoor Soundscapes in Residential Buildings: A Systematic Review , 2019, Sustainability.

[20]  Klas Hagberg,et al.  Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Impact Noise Sources in Wooden Buildings , 2013 .

[21]  Christ Glorieux,et al.  Perceived Loudness of Neighbour Sounds Heard Through Heavy and Light-Weight Walls with Equal R w + C 50 – 5000 , 2016 .

[22]  PerMagnus Lindborg,et al.  Psychoacoustic, physical, and perceptual features of restaurants : A field survey in Singapore , 2015 .

[23]  Kim,et al.  Comparison of the Standard Floor Impact Sound with Living Impact Source by Subjective Evaluation , 2014 .

[24]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  A systematic review of human perceptual dimensions of sound: Meta-analysis of semantic differential method applications to indoor and outdoor sounds , 2018 .

[25]  Alpin Köknel Yener,et al.  Building envelope design with the objective to ensure thermal, visual and acoustic comfort conditions , 2004 .

[26]  H. Scheffé An Analysis of Variance for Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[27]  Francesco Aletta,et al.  A soundscape approach to exploring design strategies for acoustic comfort in modern public libraries: a case study of the Library of Birmingham , 2016 .

[28]  César Díaz,et al.  The Reverberation Time and Equivalent Sound Absorption Area of Rooms in Dwellings , 2007 .

[29]  Valtteri Hongisto,et al.  Subjective and Objective Rating of Impact Sound Insulation of a Concrete Floor with Various Coverings , 2017 .

[30]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Psychoacoustical Characteristics of Impact Ball Sounds on Concrete Floors , 2009 .

[31]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  A Study on the Reverberation Time Characteristics of Inside Space of Apartment Buildings , 2015 .

[32]  Monika Rychtarikova,et al.  Subjective and objective acoustic performance ranking of heavy and light weight walls , 2016 .

[33]  Kenji Kurakata,et al.  Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Jukka Keränen,et al.  Subjective and Objective Rating of Airborne Sound Insulation – Living Sounds , 2014 .

[35]  Toshiki Hanyu,et al.  LISTENING TEST METHOD FOR INVESTIGATING EFFECT OF SOUND ABSORPTION ON COMFORT PROVIDED BY SOUND ENVIRONMENTS IN RESIDENCES , 2014 .

[36]  Draško Mašovi,et al.  Analysis of Reverberation Time Field Measurement Results in Building Acoustics , 2022 .

[37]  Semiha Yilmazer,et al.  Understanding the indoor soundscape in public transport spaces: A case study in Akköprü metro station, Ankara , 2017 .

[38]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Acoustical measurements in some Canadian homes , 1986 .

[39]  C. Joo,et al.  SOUND ABSORPTION PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED POLYESTER FIBROUS ASSEMBLY ABSORBERS , 2003, AUTEX Research Journal.

[40]  B. Berglund,et al.  A principal components model of soundscape perception. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  PerMagnus Lindborg,et al.  A taxonomy of sound sources in restaurants , 2016 .

[42]  David Oliva,et al.  Optimized single-number quantity for rating the airborne sound insulation of constructions: Living sounds. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  César Díaz,et al.  The reverberation time of furnished rooms in dwellings , 2005 .

[44]  Francesco Babich,et al.  Indoor soundscape assessment: A principal components model of acoustic perception in residential buildings , 2020, Building and Environment.