QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley.

Combining ecophysiological modelling and genetic mapping has increasingly received attention from researchers who wish to predict complex plant or crop traits under diverse environmental conditions. The potential for using this combined approach to predict flowering time of individual genotypes in a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was examined. An ecophysiological phenology model predicts preflowering duration as affected by temperature and photoperiod, based on the following four input traits: f(o) (the minimum number of days to flowering at the optimum temperature and photoperiod), theta1 and theta2 (the development stages for the start and the end of the photoperiod-sensitive phase, respectively), and delta (the photoperiod sensitivity). The model-input trait values were obtained from a photoperiod-controlled greenhouse experiment. Assuming additivity of QTL effects, a multiple QTL model was fitted for the model-input traits using composite interval mapping. Four to seven QTL were identified for each trait. Each trait had at least one QTL specific to that trait alone. Other QTL were shared by two or all traits. Values of the model-input traits predicted for the RILs from the QTL model were fed back into the ecophysiological model. This QTL-based ecophysiological model was subsequently used to predict preflowering duration (d) for eight field trial environments. The model accounted for 72% of the observed variation among 94 RILs and 94% of the variation among the two parents across the eight environments, when observations in different environments were pooled. However, due to the low percentage (34-41%) of phenotypic variation accounted for by the identified QTL for three model-input traits (theta1, theta2 and delta), the QTL-based model accounted for somewhat less variation among the RILs than the model using original phenotypic input trait values. Nevertheless, days to flowering as predicted from the QTL-based ecophysiological model were highly correlated with days to flowering as predicted from QTL-models per environment for days to flowering per se. The ecophysiological phenology model was thus capable of extrapolating (QTL) information from one environment to another.

[1]  Michael J. Kearsey,et al.  Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 2020 .

[2]  R. Phillips,et al.  DNA-based markers in plants , 2012, Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants.

[3]  Jianjun Tang,et al.  Model analysis of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  J. Peleman,et al.  Breeding by design. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[5]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist's perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[7]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley , 2000, Heredity.

[8]  J. V. Ooijen,et al.  LOD significance thresholds for QTL analysis in experimental populations of diploid species , 1999, Heredity.

[9]  M. J. Kropff,et al.  AFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-determining physiological characters in spring barley , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[10]  D. Stratton Reaction norm functions and QTL–environment interactions for flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1998, Heredity.

[11]  D. Hoisington,et al.  Marker-assisted selection: new tools and strategies , 1998 .

[12]  Z B Zeng,et al.  Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. , 1995, Genetics.

[13]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms , 1988, Nature.

[14]  Z. Zeng,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant and missing markers in various crosses from two inbred lines , 2004, Genetica.

[15]  F. Tardieu Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[16]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding , 2003 .

[17]  R. Voorrips MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. , 2002, The Journal of heredity.

[18]  F. Eeuwijk,et al.  Analysing QTL by environment interaction by factorial regression, with an application to the CIMMYT drought and low nitrogen stress programme in maize , 2002 .

[19]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding , 2001 .

[20]  N. Young,et al.  DNA-Based Markers in Plants , 2001, Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants.

[21]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  A model analysis of yield differences among recombinant inbred lines in barley , 2000 .

[22]  R. Jansen,et al.  MapQTL 4.0: Software For The Calculation Of QTL Positions On Genetic Maps , 2000 .

[23]  Van Ooijen JW LOD significance thresholds for QTL analysis in experimental populations of diploid species , 1999, Heredity.

[24]  M. Kearsey,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction , 1996 .

[25]  R. Jansen Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in plants : a novel statistical approach , 1995 .

[26]  A. Kilian,et al.  RFLP maps of barley , 1994 .