Development of an implicit material point method for geotechnical applications

Abstract An implicit material point method (MPM), a variant of the finite element method (FEM), is presented in this paper. The key feature of MPM is that the spatial discretisation uses a set of material points, which are allowed to move freely through the background mesh. All history-dependent variables are tracked on the material points and these material points are used as integration points similar to the Gaussian points. A mapping and re-mapping algorithm is employed, to allow the state variables and other information to be mapped back and forth between the material points and background mesh nodes during an analysis. In contrast to an explicit time integration scheme utilised by most researchers, an implicit time integration scheme has been utilised here. The advantages of such an approach are twofold: firstly, it addresses the limitation of the time step size inherent in explicit integration schemes, thereby potentially saving significant computational costs for certain types of problems; secondly, it enables an improved algorithm accuracy, which is important for some constitutive behaviours, such as elasto-plasticity. The main purpose of this paper is to provide a unified MPM framework, in which both quasi-static and dynamic analyses can be solved, and to demonstrate the model behaviour. The implementation closely follows standard FEM approaches, where possible, to allow easy conversion of other FEM codes. Newton’s method is used to solve the equation of motion for both cases, while the formation of the mass matrix and the required updating of the kinematic variables are unique to the dynamic analysis. Comparisons with an Updated Lagrangian FEM and an explicit MPM code are made with respect to the algorithmic accuracy and time step size in a couple of representative examples, which helps to illustrate the relative performance and advantages of the implicit MPM. A geotechnical application is then considered, illustrating the capabilities of the proposed method when applied in the geotechnical field.

[1]  Xia Ma,et al.  Material point method enhanced by modified gradient of shape function , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Pieter A. Vermeer,et al.  Solution of quasi‐static large‐strain problems by the material point method , 2010 .

[3]  Liang Jin Lim,et al.  Pile penetration simulation with Material Point Method , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas Benz,et al.  Large deformation analysis using a quasi-static material point method. , 2008 .

[5]  Deborah Sulsky,et al.  Implicit dynamics in the material-point method , 2004 .

[6]  James B Hoying,et al.  Computational modeling of multicellular constructs with the material point method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Howard L. Schreyer,et al.  Axisymmetric form of the material point method with applications to upsetting and Taylor impact problems , 1996 .

[8]  Pieter A. Vermeer,et al.  The modelling of anchors using the material point method , 2005 .

[9]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Programming the finite element method , 1982 .

[10]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[11]  A. Sadeghirad,et al.  A convected particle domain interpolation technique to extend applicability of the material point method for problems involving massive deformations , 2011 .

[12]  D. Borst,et al.  Fundamental issues in finite element analyses of localization of deformation , 1993 .

[13]  Issam K. J. al Kafaji Formulation of a dynamic material point method (MPM) for geomechanical problems , 2013 .

[14]  C. M. Mast Modeling Landslide-Induced Flow Interactions with Structures using the Material Point Method , 2013 .

[15]  Yanping Lian,et al.  Coupling of finite element method with material point method by local multi-mesh contact method , 2011 .

[16]  Anna Giacomini,et al.  Caveats on the implementation of the generalized material point method , 2008 .

[17]  L. Andersen,et al.  Analysis of Stress Updates in the Material-point Method , 2009 .

[18]  Thomas C. Henderson,et al.  Simulating accidental fires and explosions , 2000, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[19]  Sung-Kie Youn,et al.  A particle‐in‐cell solution to the silo discharging problem , 1999 .

[20]  D. Sulsky Erratum: Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics , 1995 .

[21]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[22]  Woo Kuen Shin Numerical simulation of landslides and debris flows using an enhanced material point method , 2009 .

[23]  Wenqing Hu,et al.  Model-based simulation of the synergistic effects of blast and fragmentation on a concrete wall using the MPM , 2006 .

[24]  James E. Guilkey,et al.  Implicit time integration for the material point method: Quantitative and algorithmic comparisons with the finite element method , 2003 .

[25]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Multi-scale modelling of granular avalanches , 2013 .

[26]  Z. Więckowski The material point method in large strain engineering problems , 2004 .

[27]  D. L. Shirer Basic: the little language that wouldn't die , 2000 .

[28]  S. Bardenhagen,et al.  The Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method , 2004 .

[29]  D. Sulsky,et al.  A particle method for history-dependent materials , 1993 .