Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0

Research indicates that migrants' social media usage in Ireland enables a background awareness of friends and acquaintances that supports bonding capital and transnational communities in ways not previously reported. Interview data from 65 Polish and Filipino non-nationals in Ireland provide evidence that their social media practices enable a shared experience with friends and relations living outside Ireland that is not simply an elaboration of the social relations enabled by earlier Internet applications. Social media usage enables a passive monitoring of others, through the circulation of voice, video, text, and pictures, that maintains a low level mutual awareness and supports a dispersed community of affinity. This ambient, or background, awareness of others enhances and supports dispersed communities by contributing to bonding capital. This may lead to significant changes in the process of migration by slowing down the process of integration and participation in host societies while also encouraging continual movement of migrants from one society to another. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .

[2]  Anandam P. Kavoori,et al.  Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective , 2009 .

[3]  N. Yeates.  A dialogue with ‘global care chain’ analysis: nurse migration in the Irish context , 2004 .

[4]  R. Wilding.  'Virtual' intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts , 2006 .

[5]  Dana Diminescu.  The connected migrant: an epistemological manifesto , 2008 .

[6]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Weak Ties in Networked Communities , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[7]  A. Portes.  Introduction: the debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism , 2001 .

[8]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[9]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Steven G. Jones.  Cybersociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community , 1998 .

[11]  M. Castells.  Die Internet-Galaxie , 2001 .

[12]  Fredrick Barth,et al.  Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. , 1971 .

[13]  John Postill,et al.  Localizing the internet beyond communities and networks , 2008, New Media Soc..

[14]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[15]  Harry H. Hiller,et al.  New ties, old ties and lost ties: the use of the internet in diaspora , 2004, New Media Soc..

[16]  M. Freedman,et al.  Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference , 1970 .

[17]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life , 2006 .

[18]  Lee Komito,et al.  Virtually local: social media and community among Polish nationals in Dublin , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[19]  Alain Degenne.  Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[20]  R. Cohen.  Global Diasporas: An Introduction , 1998 .

[21]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[22]  T. Dundon,et al.  Bitten by the Celtic Tiger: Immigrant Workers and Industrial Relations in the New `Glocalized' Ireland , 2007 .

[23]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[24]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Social Networking Websites and Teens , 2007 .

[25]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[27]  Lee Komito,et al.  Electronic communities in an information society: paradise, mirage, or malaise? , 2001, J. Documentation.

[28]  Graham Vickery,et al.  Participative Web And User-Created Content: Web 2.0 Wikis and Social Networking , 2007 .

[29]  K. Karahalios,et al.  The Network in the Garden: Designing Social Media for Rural Life , 2010 .

[30]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Finding Commection in a Computerized World , 1993 .

[31]  Greg Hearn,et al.  Knowledge Policy: Challenges for the 21st Century , 2008 .

[32]  Jerrald D. Krause,et al.  The community : approaches and applications , 1975 .

[33]  Leigh Burstein,et al.  Data Collection , 1985 .

[34]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  The Death of Distance , 1996 .

[35]  J S MACDONALD,et al.  CHAIN MIGRATION, ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOOD FORMATION AND SOCIAL NETWORKS. , 1964, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[36]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[37]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  M. Beine,et al.  Diasporas , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[39]  B. Wellman,et al.  Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities , 1979 .

[40]  Viviana Premazzi,et al.  The State of the Art of Research in the EU on the Uptake and Use of ICT by Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities , 2009 .

[41]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[42]  Andrew Feenberg,et al.  Virtual Community: No ‘Killer Implication’ , 2004, New Media Soc..

[43]  J. Farr.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[44]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[45]  Ajit Pyati,et al.  Diasporic information environments: Reframing immigrant-focused information research , 2007 .

[46]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World , 1994 .

[47]  Lee Komito,et al.  The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[48]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[49]  R. Frankenberg.  Communities in Britain: Social Life in Town and Country , 1966 .

[50]  Jan Fernback,et al.  Beyond the diluted community concept: a symbolic interactionist perspective on online social relations , 2007, New Media Soc..

[51]  M. Sökefeld.  Mobilizing in transnational space: a social movement approach to the formation of diaspora , 2006 .

[52]  N. Yeates.  Changing Places: Ireland in the International Division of Reproductive Labour , 2006 .

[53]  Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol,et al.  Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective (Information Revolution & Global Politics) , 2006 .

[54]  Lee Komito.  Information Society Policy , 2008 .

[55]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  The Age of Migration , 1993 .

[56]  James A. Tyner,et al.  Pan‐national identities: representations of the Philippine diaspora on the world wide web , 2000 .

[57]  Pramod K. Nayar,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[59]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[60]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  F. Arguillas,et al.  The Transnational Lives Of Filipino Nurses In Ireland In The Midst Of An Emerging Philippines-Ireland Migration System , 2011 .

[62]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[63]  Jørgen Ole Bærenholdt,et al.  Mobility and Place: Enacting Northern European Peripheries , 2008 .

[64]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[65]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The community question re-evaluated , 1987 .