Outcome of short implants as an alternative to sinus lift surgery and standard-length implants for rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla: A clinical trial

Iran Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of short implants (<8 mm length) as an alternative to sinus lift surgery and placement of standard-length implants (10-12 mm length) for rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla. Materials and Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, 26 patients with 6-7 mm of residual alveolar bone height in their atrophic posterior maxilla were randomly divided into two groups (n=13). The test group received short implants without sinus lift surgery while the control group received standard-length implants after maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The bone loss was evaluated at 1 to 2 years after loading of implants on radiographies and the comparison between the two groups was done using chi-square test. Results: At 1 year, two patients (15.4%) in the short implant and one patient (7.7%) in the standard implant group experienced bone loss (P=0.5). At 2 years, four patients (30.8%) in the short implant and two patients (15.4%) in the standard implant group showed bone loss (P=0.4). Conclusion: At 2 years after loading, the bone loss was not significantly different around short and standard-length implants. Short implants appeared to be a suitable alternative to sinus lift surgery and placement of standard-length implants for rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla. However, further studies with longer follow ups are still required to cast a final judgment in this

[1]  T. Taylor,et al.  Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading. , 2015, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  R. Jung,et al.  EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  S. Chuang,et al.  Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. , 2010, The Journal of oral implantology.

[4]  M. Esposito,et al.  Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  R. Kraut,et al.  Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  J. Bernard,et al.  A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  F. Renouard,et al.  Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[8]  G. Zhang,et al.  Peri-implant mucosal inflammation and bone loss: clinical and radiographic evaluation of 108 dental implants after 1-year loading. , 2000, The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association.

[9]  D Buser,et al.  Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  P. Maló,et al.  Short implants in posterior jaws. A prospective 1-year study. , 2011, European journal of oral implantology.

[12]  M. Esposito,et al.  A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone? , 2011, European journal of oral implantology.

[13]  Paul Coulthard,et al.  The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. , 2009, European journal of oral implantology.

[14]  M. Esposito,et al.  Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading. , 2009, European journal of oral implantology.

[15]  M. Esposito,et al.  Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial. , 2009, European journal of oral implantology.

[16]  H V Worthington,et al.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  C. Stellingsma.  The extremely resorbed mandible : a comparative, prospective study of three treatment strategies , 2004 .

[18]  Y. Sato,et al.  Correlation between mucosal inflammation and marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a 3-year cross-sectional study. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.