Capabilities and limitations of detailed hillslope hydrological modelling

Hillslope hydrological modelling is considered to be of great importance for the understanding and quantification of hydrological processes in hilly or mountainous landscapes. In recent years a few comprehensive hydrological models have been developed at the hillslope scale which have resulted in an advanced representation of hillslope hydrological processes (including their interactions), and in some operational applications, such as in runoff and erosion studies at the field scale or lateral flow simulation in environmental and geotechnical engineering. An overview of the objectives of hillslope hydrological modelling is given, followed by a brief introduction of an exemplary comprehensive hillslope model, which stimulates a series of hydrological processes such as interception, evapotranspiration, infiltration into the soil matrix and into macropores, lateral and vertical subsurface soil water flow both in the matrix and preferential flow paths, surface runoff and channel discharge. Several examples of this model are presented and discussed in order to determine the model's capabilities and limitations. Finally, conclusions about the limitations of detailed hillslope modelling are drawn and an outlook on the future prospects of hydrological models on the hillslope scale is given.The model presented performed reasonable calculations of Hortonian surface runoff and subsequent erosion processes, given detailed information of initial soil water content and soil hydraulic conditions. The vertical and lateral soil moisture dynamics were also represented quite well. However, the given examples of model applications show that quite detailed climatic and soil data are required to obtain satisfactory results. The limitations of detailed hillslope hydrological modelling arise from different points: difficulties in the representations of certain processes (e.g. surface crusting, unsaturated–saturated soil moisture flow, macropore flow), problems of small-scale variability, a general scarcity of detailed soil data, incomplete process parametrization and problems with the interdependent linkage of several hillslopes and channel–hillslope interactions. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. R. Watson,et al.  Second progress report , 1986 .

[2]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[3]  John Ewen,et al.  Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 1. Method , 1996 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hillslope hydrographs by the finite element method , 1977 .

[5]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based model of heterogeneous hillslopes: 2. Effective hydraulic conductivities , 1989 .

[6]  Robert A. Vertessy,et al.  Predicting water yield from a mountain ash forest catchment using a terrain analysis based catchment model , 1993 .

[7]  Keith Beven,et al.  The Institute of Hydrology distributed model , 1987 .

[8]  R. Moore,et al.  A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling , 1981 .

[9]  P. Dijk,et al.  Measuring and Modelling of Soil Water Dynamics and Runoff Generation in AN Agricultural Loessial Hillslope , 1996 .

[10]  Roger E. Smith,et al.  Mathematical simulation of interdependent surface and subsurface hydrologic processes , 1983 .

[11]  M. Th. van Genuchten,et al.  Parameter estimation for unsaturated flow and transport models — A review , 1987 .

[12]  R. Feddes,et al.  Simulation of field water use and crop yield , 1978 .

[13]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  Macropores and hydrologic hillslope processes. , 1990 .

[14]  K. Beven,et al.  Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three U.K. catchments , 1984 .

[15]  H. Koivusalo,et al.  Application of a two-dimensional model to calculate water balance of an agricultural hillslope , 1999 .

[16]  Zhao Ren-jun,et al.  The Xinanjiang model applied in China , 1992 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  APPLICATION OF A GENERALIZED TOPMODEL TO THE SMALL RINGELBACH CATCHMENT, VOSGES, FRANCE , 1996 .

[18]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds , 1984 .

[19]  H. Hötzl,et al.  Ergebnisse des Testfeldes zur kombinierten Kapillarsperre auf der Deponie Karlsruhe West , 1994 .

[20]  John Ewen,et al.  VALIDATION OF CATCHMENT MODELS FOR PREDICTING LAND-USE AND CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS. : 2. CASE STUDY FOR A MEDITERRANEAN CATCHMENT , 1996 .

[21]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[22]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[23]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  1-, 2- and 3-dimensional modeling of water movement in the unsaturated soil matrix using a fuzzy approach , 1995 .

[24]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[25]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Hillslope runoff processes and models , 1988 .

[26]  Keith Beven,et al.  Linking parameters across scales: Subgrid parameterizations and scale dependent hydrological models. , 1995 .

[27]  M. P. Mosley,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand , 1982 .

[28]  Ruth Cunningham.  First Progress Report , 1949 .

[29]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  Modelling of runoff generation and soil moisture dynamics for hillslopes and micro-catchments , 1997 .

[30]  R. A. Vertessy,et al.  Long-term growth and water balance predictions for a mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forest catchment subject to clear-felling and regeneration. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[31]  A. Rutter,et al.  A Predictive Model of Rainfall Interception in Forests. II. Generalization of the Model and Comparison with Observations in Some Coniferous and Hardwood Stands , 1975 .