Design tools for interdisciplinary translation of material experiences

Designers increasingly have the opportunity to influence the development of materials as they emerge from the laboratory. In order for this to be successful, designers need to be able to communicate effectively with materials scientists so that materials can be developed with desired functionalities and properties. This paper reviews evidence in favour of using isomorphic sets of material stimuli as tools to bridge the disciplinary gap between designers and materials scientists. We show how these isomorphic sets and their accompanying experiments can be used to translate between the two communities, and to systematically explore the relationship between the technical attributes of materials and subjective experiences of their sound, taste and feel. This paper also explores the limitations of psychophysical approaches and other quantitative techniques for elucidating material experience, and suggests new possibilities for interdisciplinary collaborations that draw on ethnographic approaches.

[1]  Agnieszka Bialek,et al.  Model development to predict perceived degree of naturalness , 2009 .

[2]  M. Di Luca,et al.  Effects of visual–haptic asynchronies and loading–unloading movements on compliance perception , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  Owain Pedgley,et al.  INVIGORATING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING EDUCATION , 2010 .

[4]  Jane Schneider,et al.  In and out of polyester: Desire, disdain and global fibre competitions , 1994 .

[5]  Lissa Roberts,et al.  The Death of the Sensuous Chemist: The 'New' Chemistry and the Transformation of Sensuous Technology , 1995 .

[6]  Salvador Soto-Faraco,et al.  I can't believe this isn't wood! An investigation in the perception of naturalness. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  Looking hot or feeling hot: What determines the product experience of warmth? , 2010 .

[8]  Webb Keane,et al.  Signs Are Not the Garb of Meaning: On the Social Analysis of Material Things , 2005, Materiality.

[9]  A. Kappers,et al.  Tactile perception of thermal diffusivity , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  W. M. Latimer,et al.  The oxidation states of the elements and their potentials in aqueous solutions , 1938 .

[11]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Fiberness, reflectiveness and roughness in the characterization of natural and high quality materials , 2014 .

[12]  Zoe Laughlin,et al.  The Sound and Taste of Materials , 2014 .

[13]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together , 2012 .

[14]  Mark Miodownik,et al.  Toward designing new sensoaesthetic materials , 2007 .

[15]  Thomas K Lloyd.  Material Matters: Architecture and Material Practice , 2007 .

[16]  和田 八三久.  Materials science. , 1973, Science.

[17]  Mark Miodownik,et al.  The Perception of Materials through Oral Sensation , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  Bernadette Bensaude‐Vincent,et al.  Chemistry: The Impure Science , 2009 .

[19]  CHEMICAL PRINCIPLES , 1921 .

[20]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. , 2001, Somatosensory & motor research.

[21]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic perception: A tutorial , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Investing in new materials: a tool for technology managers , 2005 .

[23]  Gay Hawkins,et al.  Packaging water: plastic bottles as market and public devices , 2011 .

[24]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers , 2007 .

[25]  B. Green,et al.  Studying taste as a cutaneous sense , 2003 .

[26]  S. E. Wilkes.  Sustainability and the co-constitution of substances and subjects , 2015 .

[27]  G. Pocius,et al.  Metaphor and Material Culture , 2001 .

[28]  Zoe Laughlin,et al.  Material Matters: New Materials in Design , 2012 .

[29]  Lorraine Daston,et al.  Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective , 1992 .

[30]  S. E. Wilkes.  In search of sustainable materials: negotiating materiality and morality in the UK materials industry , 2014 .

[31]  Valentina Rognoli,et al.  A BROAD SURVEY ON EXPRESSIVE-SENSORIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALS FOR DESIGN EDUCATION , 2010 .

[32]  Mark Jones,et al.  An investigation into the sensory properties of materials , 2001 .

[33]  Nicky Gregson,et al.  Inextinguishable Fibres: Demolition and the Vital Materialisms of Asbestos , 2010 .

[34]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[35]  R. Cahn,et al.  Made to Measure: New Materials for the 21st Century , 1998 .

[36]  D. Valentin,et al.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[37]  Ine Wouters,et al.  Architects’ considerations while selecting materials , 2012 .

[38]  M. Miodownik,et al.  The use of physical property data to predict the touch perception of materials , 2012 .

[39]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design , 2002 .

[40]  Mark Miodownik,et al.  The use of standard electrode potentials to predict the taste of solid metals , 2011 .

[41]  D. Kenshalo,et al.  Somesthetic senses. , 1962, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent,et al.  Materials science: a field about to explode? , 2004, Nature materials.

[43]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.