Variations in Low-Risk Cesarean Delivery Rates in the United States Using the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Definition

OBJECTIVE To assess variations in low-risk cesarean delivery rates in the United States using the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) definition of low-risk for cesarean delivery and to identify factors associated with low-risk cesarean deliveries. METHODS From hospital discharge data in the 2018 National Inpatient Sample and State Inpatient Databases, we identified deliveries that were low-risk for cesarean delivery using the SMFM definition based on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We estimated national low-risk cesarean delivery rates overall and by patient characteristics, clinically relevant conditions not included in the SMFM definition, and hospital characteristics based on the nationally representative sample of hospital discharges in the National Inpatient Sample. Multivariate logistic regressions were estimated for the national sample to identify factors associated with low-risk cesarean delivery. We reported low-risk cesarean delivery rates for 27 states and the District of Columbia based on the annual state data that represented the universe of hospital discharges from participating states in the State Inpatient Databases. RESULTS Of an estimated 3,634,724 deliveries in the 2018 National Inpatient Sample, 2,484,874 low-risk deliveries met inclusion criteria. The national low-risk cesarean delivery rate in 2018 was 14.6% (95% CI 14.4-14.8%). The rates varied widely by state (range 8.9-18.6%). Nationally, maternal age older than 40 years, non-Hispanic Black or Asian race, private insurance as primary payer, admission on weekday, obesity, diabetes, or hypertension, large metropolitan residence, and hospitals of the South census region were associated with low-risk cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION Approximately one in seven low-risk deliveries was by cesarean in 2018 in the United States using the SMFM definition and the low-risk cesarean delivery rates varied widely by state.

[1]  Shen-Chih Chang,et al.  Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California. , 2021, JAMA.

[2]  M. D'Alton,et al.  Population risk factors for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex caesarean birth: a national cross‐sectional study , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  M. Hedderson,et al.  Mediating Effects of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors on the Association Between Maternal Race-Ethnicity and Cesarean Delivery Among Low-Risk Women. , 2021, Journal of women's health.

[4]  A. Friedman,et al.  Identification of Delivery Encounters Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Diagnosis and Procedure Codes. , 2020, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  E. Valdes,et al.  Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates by Race: a Population-Based Analysis Using the Robson Ten-Group Classification System , 2020, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.

[6]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Maternal Obesity and the Risk of Early-Onset and Late-Onset Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. , 2020, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. , 2020, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2018. , 2019, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[9]  A. Peters,et al.  Management of Preexisting Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Review , 2019, JAMA.

[10]  D. Patel,et al.  Maternal risk factor index and cesarean delivery among women with nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex deliveries, Texas, 2015 , 2018, Birth.

[11]  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 29: Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  D. Chang,et al.  Does the Day of the Week Predict a Cesarean Section? A Statewide Analysis. , 2019, The Journal of surgical research.

[13]  V. Tangel,et al.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Outcomes and the Disadvantage of Peripartum Black Women: A Multistate Analysis, 2007–2014 , 2018, American Journal of Perinatology.

[14]  F. Barros,et al.  Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections , 2018, The Lancet.

[15]  C. Homer,et al.  Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children , 2018, The Lancet.

[16]  M. Rice,et al.  Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low‐Risk Nulliparous Women , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Ecker,et al.  Hospital volume and cesarean delivery among low-risk women in a nationwide sample , 2018, Journal of Perinatology.

[18]  T. Benedetti,et al.  A Comparison of the Nulliparous-Term-Singleton-Vertex and Society of Maternal–Fetal Medicine Cesarean Birth Metrics Based on Hospital Size , 2017, American Journal of Perinatology.

[19]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Chronic hypertension and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[20]  G. Saade,et al.  Coding update of the SMFM definition of low risk for cesarean delivery from ICD‐9‐CM to ICD‐10‐CM , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  G. Saade,et al.  Association of Recorded Estimated Fetal Weight and Cesarean Delivery in Attempted Vaginal Delivery at Term , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  M. van Ryn,et al.  Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity , 2015, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[23]  B. Friedman,et al.  Geographic variation in cesarean delivery in the United States by payer , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[24]  L. Poston,et al.  Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Gynecologists Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  James M. Roberts,et al.  Hypertension in Pregnancy: Executive Summary , 2013 .

[27]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Maternal Obesity and Risk of Preterm Delivery , 2014 .

[28]  K. Kozhimannil,et al.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues. , 2013, Health affairs.

[29]  U. Reddy,et al.  Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem. , 2012, Seminars in perinatology.

[30]  Yvonne W. Cheng,et al.  Quality and equality in obstetric care: racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates. , 2009, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[31]  D. Wing,et al.  Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  C. Qiu,et al.  Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight status and obesity as risk factors for cesarean delivery , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[33]  Mary E D'Alton,et al.  Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate--a population-based screening study. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  P. Braveman,et al.  Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California. , 1995, American journal of public health.