Governance and innovation in public sector services: The case of the digital library

Abstract This paper examines the co-evolution of public governance and innovation, and proposes an adaptation of Hartley's model to take into consideration such co-evolution. This model is then applied to a longitudinal case study of the digitalization of Roskilde University Library. The theoretical and empirical analysis yields four main results. First, it is shown that the transition from a New Public Management approach towards a Networked Governance mode implies a greater distribution of knowledge and innovation across different organisational levels within public administrations. Interactions between such organisational levels crucially affect the development of new public services. Second, a more articulated view of users in public sector innovation is developed. It is argued that: (i) users play distinct roles at different stages in innovation processes, with relatively greater involvement in minor incremental changes; (ii) user-driven innovations have significantly increased with the diffusion of ICTs and Web based public services; and (iii) complex innovations are facilitated by face-to-face meetings between public servants and users. Third, it is suggested that changes in governance modes affect the balance between the different actors involved, thus influencing the nature and intensity of innovation. Fourth and finally, it is argued that the transition towards a networked governance approach requires information policies which persist over time, and are designed to increase collaboration between different (public and private) actors.

[1]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in public services: Filling a gap in the literature , 2013 .

[3]  Jesper Holgersson,et al.  Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  平澤,et al.  Innovation in Governance , 1999 .

[5]  Federico Belotti,et al.  Technology Adoption and Innovation in Public Services: The Case of E-Government in Italy , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[6]  Charles R Meyer,et al.  Inside the black box. , 2008, Minnesota medicine.

[7]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Mehmet Karahan,et al.  A case study on innovation activities in Turkey and the obstacles for innovation , 2013 .

[9]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[10]  B. Buttenfield,et al.  Information and Institutional Change: The Case of Digital Libraries , 2003 .

[11]  S. Lenway,et al.  Knowledge and competitive advantage, the coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions , 2003 .

[12]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Hanne Westh Nicolajsen,et al.  Using Social Media for Service Innovations: Challenges and Pitfalls , 2013, Int. J. E Bus. Res..

[14]  William A. Robson,et al.  Justice and administrative law , 1929 .

[15]  Frederique Savignac,et al.  The Impact of Financial Constraints on Innovation: What Can Be Learned from a Direct Measure? , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  The New Public Governance? 1 , 2006 .

[17]  Wu He,et al.  An online knowledge-centred framework for faculty support and service innovation , 2013 .

[18]  P. Windrum Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Public Services , 2008 .

[19]  John Clayton Thomas Citizen, customer, partner : engaging the public in public management , 2012 .

[20]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers , 2001 .

[21]  Zoe Radnor,et al.  A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach , 2013 .

[22]  Richard Harris The Internet as a GPT: Factor Market Implications , 1996 .

[23]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[24]  Paolo Seri,et al.  The co-evolution of ICT, skills and organization in public administrations: Evidence from new European country-level data , 2013 .

[25]  Filipa Dionísio Vieira,et al.  Barriers to innovation in SMEs: An international comparison , 2012 .

[26]  A. Scupola,et al.  Investigating issues and challenges for customer involvement in business services innovation , 2011 .

[27]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[28]  Lawrence B. Solum Models of Internet Governance , 2008, Internet Governance - Infrastructure and Institutions.

[29]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[30]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[31]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[32]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[33]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Diffusion of Web-Based Product Innovation , 2006 .

[34]  P. Nambisan,et al.  How to Profit From a Better ¿Virtual Customer Environment¿ , 2008 .

[35]  Athanasios Hadjimanolis,et al.  Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus) , 1999 .

[36]  Fabrice Galia,et al.  Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France , 2004 .

[37]  Jane E. Fountain Enacting Technology in Networked Governance: Developmental Processes of Cross-Agency Arrangements , 2006 .

[38]  Stella Neal The virtual library ‐ a market perspective , 2013 .

[39]  P. Duin,et al.  The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation , 2008 .

[40]  Xavier Vence Deza,et al.  Regional Concentration of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in Europe , 2014 .

[41]  Lars Bo Jeppesen,et al.  Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[42]  Carlota Perez,et al.  Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems , 1983 .

[43]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present , 2005 .

[44]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  DESIGNING VIRTUAL CUSTOMER ENVIRONMENTS FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT : TOWARD A THEORY , 2005 .

[45]  Stephen Flowers,et al.  Drawing Users into Innovation Policy: A Study of the Danish Policy on User-Driven Innovation , 2011 .

[46]  E. Helpman General purpose technologies and economic growth , 1998 .

[47]  Janet Newman,et al.  Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society , 2001 .

[48]  C. Perry,et al.  A customer‐oriented new service development process , 2002 .

[49]  S. Osborne The new public governance? : emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance , 2010 .

[50]  Ada Scupola,et al.  E-Services in Danish Research Libraries: Issues and Challenges at Roskilde University Library , 2007 .

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[52]  Lars Fuglsang Bricolage and invisible innovation in public service innovation , 2010 .

[53]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Information and Communication Technology and Public Innovation: Assessing the ICT-driven Modernization of Public Administration , 2006 .

[54]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[55]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Critical incident technique. , 2003 .

[56]  A. Scupola,et al.  Service innovation in academic libraries: is there a place for the customers? , 2010 .

[57]  George Rosen,et al.  A History of Public Health , 1959 .

[58]  Inna Plotnikova,et al.  Barriers to Innovation in the Implementation of the Investment Strategy: An Empirical Study☆ , 2015 .

[59]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  Creating a Learning Society: A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress , 2014 .

[60]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Collaborating with Customers to Innovate , 2008 .

[61]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013 , 2013 .

[62]  H. Varian,et al.  The Economics Of Information Technology , 2004 .

[63]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[64]  J. Fountain Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government , 2003 .

[65]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[66]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The circular continuum of agencies, public libraries, and users: A model of e-government in practice , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[67]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  Complementing Mass Customization Toolkits with User Communities: How Peer Input Improves Customer Self‐Design* , 2008 .

[68]  Paul F. Nunes,et al.  Big Bang Disruption: Strategy in the Age of Devastating Innovation , 2014 .

[69]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[70]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[71]  M. Toivonen,et al.  Emergence of innovations in services , 2009 .

[72]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[73]  Davide Arduini,et al.  The role of technology, organization and contextual factors in the development of e-Government services: An empirical analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations☆ , 2013 .

[74]  P. Hertog KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION , 2000 .

[75]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[76]  D. Arduini,et al.  An overview of scholarly research on public e-services? A meta-analysis of the literature , 2014 .

[77]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[78]  M. Savona,et al.  What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers , 2012 .

[79]  Jan Simmons,et al.  Creating a learning society , 2013 .

[80]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .

[81]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[82]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Challenges to Organizational Change: Multi-Level Integrated Information Structures (MIIS) , 2006 .

[83]  Mário Raposo,et al.  Barriers to Innovation faced by Manufacturing Firms in Portugal: How to overcome it? , 2007 .

[84]  Robin Mansell,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies , 2007 .

[85]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Benefits of involving users in service innovation , 2003 .

[86]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Developing Multi-Layer Information Infrastructures: Advancing Social Innovation through Public–Private Governance , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[87]  James Joyce,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977, Medical History.

[88]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology. , 1978 .

[89]  Keith Dickson,et al.  Development of national innovation policy in small developing countries: the case of Cyprus , 2001 .

[90]  Charles M. Tiebout A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[91]  Ann Roselle The effects of electronic communication and the World Wide Web on US academic documents librarians' relationships , 2001 .

[92]  Robert Jungk,et al.  Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures , 1996 .

[93]  F. Piller,et al.  Reducing the risks of new product development , 2006 .

[94]  Anton A. Huurdeman The worldwide history of telecommunications , 2003 .

[95]  Hanne Westh Nicolajsen,et al.  The Potential of Workshops vs Blogs for User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2016, Int. J. E Serv. Mob. Appl..

[96]  Barbara Austin,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning , 1994 .