The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields

Four experiments investigated observers’ judgments of rigidity for different types of optical motion. The depicted structural deformations were of two types: (1) those with nonparallel image trajectories that are detectable from the first-order spatiotemporal relations between pairs of views; and (2) those with parallel image trajectories that can only be detected from higher order relations among three or more views. Patterns were composed of smooth flow fields in Experiments 1 and 3, and of wire frame figures in Experiments 2 and 4. For both types of display, the nonrigidity detectable from the first-order spatiotemporal structure of the motion sequence was much more salient than the deformation detectable only from the higher order spatiotemporal structure. These results indicate that observers’ judgments of rigidity are based primarily on a two-view analysis, but that some useful information can be obtained under appropriate circumstances from higher order spatiotemporal relations among three or more views.

[1]  D D Hoffman,et al.  Inferring Structure from Motion in Two-View and Multiview Displays , 1993, Perception.

[2]  J T Todd,et al.  The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Yukie Saito,et al.  Integration of Stereopsis and Motion Shape Cues , 1993 .

[4]  J T Todd,et al.  The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Inferring the relative three-dimensional positions of two moving points. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  J. Todd Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: a geometric analysis. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  S. Ullman The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .

[8]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Motion and Structure from Orthographic Projections , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  J. Droulez,et al.  Visual perception of surface curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  D D Hoffman,et al.  Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  J. Todd,et al.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J F Norman,et al.  The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Minimum points and views for the recovery of three-dimensional structure. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  James T. Todd,et al.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995 .

[17]  J T Todd,et al.  Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  G J Andersen,et al.  Shape and depth perception from parallel projections of three-dimensional motion. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Structure from motion: A tolerance analysis , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.