Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

[1]  M. Desai,et al.  Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  K. Aonuma,et al.  Prognostic value of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis in Japan: Japanese Multicenter Aortic Stenosis Study, Retrospective (JUST-R) Registry. , 2015, Journal of cardiology.

[3]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. Beigel,et al.  Survival after intervention in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: new insights from weights of operatively excised aortic valves. , 2014, European heart journal.

[7]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Survival by stroke volume index in patients with low-gradient normal EF severe aortic stenosis , 2014, Heart.

[8]  B. Gerber,et al.  Natural History of Paradoxical Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[11]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Aortic Stenosis Suspected to Be Severe Despite Low Gradients , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  P. Pibarot,et al.  The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P. Wenaweser,et al.  Clinical outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis and either preserved or reduced ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2013, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Flow-Gradient Patterns in Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Survival , 2013, Circulation.

[15]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: New Evidence, More Questions , 2013, Circulation.

[16]  V. Aboyans,et al.  Outcome and Impact of Surgery in Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Cardiac Catheterization Study , 2013, Circulation.

[17]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcome of Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Gradient and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction , 2013, Circulation.

[19]  J. Hung,et al.  Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. , 2013, European heart journal.

[20]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Therapy in Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial Analysis , 2013, Circulation.

[21]  Armando Bethencourt,et al.  El análisis del flujo aórtico por ecocardiografía Doppler es útil en la estratificación pronóstica de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave con fracción de eyección normal , 2013 .

[22]  A. Bethencourt,et al.  Systolic volume index by Doppler echocardiography is an useful marker for stratification and prognostic evaluation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. , 2013, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[23]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[24]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). , 2012, European heart journal.

[27]  E. Donal,et al.  Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  G. Gerosa,et al.  Valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction exceeding 0.50. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  W. Aronow,et al.  OUTCOMES AND SURVIVAL WITH AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT COMPARED WITH MEDICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LOW-, MODERATE- AND SEVERE-GRADIENT SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS AND NORMAL LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION , 2011 .

[30]  W. Aronow,et al.  Outcomes and Survival with Aortic Valve Replacement Compared with Medical Therapy in Patients with Low‐, Moderate‐, and Severe‐Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction , 2011, Echocardiography.

[31]  J. Chambers,et al.  Outcome of Patients With Low-Gradient “Severe” Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction , 2011, Circulation.

[32]  F. Neumann,et al.  Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function , 2010, Heart.

[33]  B. Carabello,et al.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment , 2009, European heart journal.

[34]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[35]  N. Reichek,et al.  Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights. , 2008, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[36]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival , 2007, Circulation.

[37]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology , 2007 .

[38]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  E. Antman,et al.  Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary , 1998, Circulation.