论文信息 - Representation is Overrated: Some Critical Remarks about the Use of the Concept of Representation in Science Studies - 字舞流文

Representation is Overrated: Some Critical Remarks about the Use of the Concept of Representation in Science Studies

Michael Lynch | M. Lynch

[1] E. Tiryakian,et al. Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments. , 1970 .

[2] R. Rhees. Discussions of Wittgenstein , 1970 .

[3] J. M. Atkinson. Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[4] H. Garfinkel,et al. I.1 The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar , 1981 .

[5] Jeff Coulter,et al. Mind in Action , 1989 .

[6] B. Latour. Science in Action , 1987 .

[7] J. Coulter,et al. The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action , 1990 .

[8] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[9] P. Winch,et al. The Idea of a Social Science , 1960 .

[10] Construction, Alienation And Emancipation: Thoughts On Abir‐Am's Ethnography Of Scientific Rituals (With Response) , 1992 .

[11] Ian Hacking,et al. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science , 1983 .

[12] G. Button. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences: Contributors , 1991 .

[13] Harvey Sacks,et al. Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[14] M. Lynch. Scientific practice and ordinary action : ethnomethodology and social studies of science , 1994 .

[15] Steve Woolgar,et al. Science, the very idea , 1988 .

[16] A. Koller,et al. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .