Sweat the small stuff: A case study of small-scale change processes and consequences in acute care

Solving small, annoying problems may appear to be unimportant in a political, demographic, and economic climate that focuses attention on radical long-term changes to the organization, delivery, funding, and regulation of the healthcare system. Most contemporary commentary emphasizes the need for large-scale, major, strategic, transformational change. Deliberately designed to focus on minor issues, however, the intervention reported here, in a hospital gastroenterology department, demonstrates how small changes generate major benefits for patients, staff, and hospital performance. This approach can also strengthen clinical–managerial relationships, which are key to larger scale changes and which suffer when ‘the small stuff’ is not fixed. The success of this intervention is explained with reference to a model of change combining context, content, process, and individual dispositions. The intervention, however, is easily modified to suit different contexts and was subsequently used successfully in other service areas in the same hospital. These outcomes present a challenge to the contemporary preoccupation with transformational change. Healthcare managers are thus advised, on the basis of this experience, to be alert to what appear to be minor unresolved issues, and to address these rapidly, in addition to larger scale, longer term projects.

[1]  D. Stace,et al.  Beyond the Boundaries: Leading and RE-Creating the Successful Enterprise , 1994 .

[2]  Rosemary Rushmer,et al.  A systematic narrative review of quality improvement models in health care , 2009 .

[3]  P. Dimitrijevic 10 High Impact Changes for service improvement and delivery: a guide for NHS leaders , 2008 .

[4]  J. De,et al.  Will disruptive innovations cure health care , 2000 .

[5]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Understanding Organizational Change: The Contemporary Experience of People at Work , 2002 .

[6]  Jeremy B. Bernerth,et al.  Factors influencing organizational change efforts: An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences , 2007 .

[7]  Julia Balogun,et al.  Devising Context Sensitive Approaches To Change: The Example of Glaxo Wellcome , 2002 .

[8]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Change Without Pain: How Managers Can Overcome Initiative Overload, Organizational Chaos, and Employee Burnout , 2003 .

[9]  R. Brown,et al.  Professionals in Health Care: Perceptions of Managers , 1993 .

[10]  John P. Kotter,et al.  A Sense of Urgency , 2008 .

[11]  David Lazer,et al.  Building Effective Intra-Organizational Networks: The Role of Teams , 2003 .

[12]  S. Harrison,et al.  ‘Animateurs’ and Animation: What Makes a Good Commissioning Manager? , 2012, Journal of health services research & policy.

[13]  Julia Balogun,et al.  Managing Change: Steering a Course between Intended Strategies and Unanticipated Outcomes , 2006 .

[14]  Claire Moxham,et al.  Quality Improvement: Theory and Practice in Healthcare , 2008 .

[15]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[16]  A. Langley,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations , 2001 .

[17]  Ann Taket,et al.  SHAPING STRATEGIC CHANGE - MAKING CHANGE IN LARGE ORGANIZATIONS - THE CASE OF THE NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE - PETTIGREW,A, FERLIE,E, MCKEE,L , 1994 .

[18]  L. Locock,et al.  Healthcare redesign: meaning, origins and application , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[19]  D M Berwick,et al.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.