3D FEA Study On Implant Threading Role on Selection of Implant and Crown Materials

AIM: This study deeply investigates the effect of dental implant threading and material selection on the mandibular bone under two different crown materials (Translucent Zirconia and Porcelain fused to metal). METHODS: Two different designs of single piece dental implants were supporting dummy crown above simplified bone geometry in two finite element models. Models components were created by general-purpose CAD/CAM engineering package and then assembled inside ANSYS before meshing and assigning materials. Compressive loading of 100 N and 45º oblique loading of 50 N were tested. RESULTS: Twenty-four case studies were analysed, and their results were compared. Micro thread reduces implant maximum Von Mises stress by about 50 to 70% than regular thread one. Oblique loading of 50 N will produce 4 to 5 times more maximum Von Mises values on implant body than 100 N vertical loading. Zero or negligible effect on the cortical bone was recorded when exchanging the tested crown material. Although titanium implant can also reduce cortical bone, Von Mises stress by 50 to 100% in comparison to reinforced PEKK (poly ether-ketone-ketone) or PEEK (poly-ether-ether-ketone). CONCLUSIONS: Reinforced PEKK and PEEK implants can represent a good alternative to titanium implants. Zirconia crown distributes the applied load better than Porcelain fused to a metal one. Regardless of the implant material, an implant with the micro thread has superior behaviour in comparison to a regular one. Zirconia crown above titanium implant with the micro thread may represent the best option for patient bone.

[1]  K. Almas,et al.  Microthreaded Implants and Crestal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review , 2017, The Journal of oral implantology.

[2]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Muhammad Sohail Zafar,et al.  Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. , 2016, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[4]  Pao-Hsin Liu,et al.  Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  M. El-Anwar,et al.  The effect of using different crown and implant materials on bone stress distribution: a finite element study , 2014 .

[6]  Eugenio Guglielmino,et al.  FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis. , 2014, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[7]  Andreas Schwitalla,et al.  PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. , 2013, The Journal of oral implantology.

[8]  Wenjia Lai,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells in response to bioinert implant material titanium and polyetheretherketone. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[9]  Young-Jun Lim,et al.  Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[10]  M. El-Anwar,et al.  Load Transfer on Dental Implants and Surrounding Bones , 2012 .

[11]  Mohamed I. El-Anwar,et al.  A three dimensional finite element study on dental implant design , 2011 .

[12]  Ariadne Cruz,et al.  Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  A. Jahn-Eimermacher,et al.  Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  Neha Goel,et al.  Calvarial Reconstruction With Polyetheretherketone Implants , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  S. Kurtz,et al.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[16]  M. Çehreli,et al.  The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses--a review. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  G. Springer,et al.  Composite Implant for Bone Replacement , 1997 .

[19]  J. C. Roberts,et al.  Design, analysis, and fabrication of a composite segmental bone replacement implant , 1997 .

[20]  K. Liao Performance characterization and modeling of a composite hip prosthesis , 2008 .

[21]  R. Jamison,et al.  Intraoperative Impact: Characterization and Laboratory Simulation on Composite Hip prostheses , 1993 .