A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science

The focus of this study was to investigate the manner and the degree to which science teachers consider the nature of the subject matter in their decision making addressing the planning and the delivery of instructional tasks. An assumption of the study is that considerations for the nature of the subject matter should be a factor in a teacher's decision making about what to teach and how to teach. Relevant research literature reviewed includes (1) human decision making and the development of cognitive models of reality, (2) modern philosophies of science, and (3) philosophy of science and science education. Methods of data collection and of data analysis followed Spradley's Developmental Research Sequence guidelines for conducting ethnographic research. Validity of research findings was established from the triangulation of observations, interviews, and documents and surveys. The goal of the research was the development of grounded hypotheses about science TEACHERS' pedagogical decision making. Based on the results of this study it is hypothesized that science TEACHERS' decision-making models of reality for the selection, implementation, and development of instructional tasks are dominated by considerations for (a) student development, (b) curriculum guide objectives, and (c) pressures of accountability. Little, if any, consideration is given to the nature of the subject matter by the science teachers in decision making. Implications exist for the disenfranchisement of teachers from the task of making decisions concerning what to teach.

[1]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum , 1988 .

[2]  F. Connelly.  Teachers’ Roles in the Using and Doing of Research and Curriculum Development , 1980 .

[3]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  What happens in high school science classrooms , 1987 .

[4]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Role of Target Students in the Science Classroom. , 1987 .

[5]  Liberal Education in Biology: An Inquiry Perspective. , 1972 .

[6]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. , 1971 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[8]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[10]  S. Carey.  Cognitive science and science education. , 1986 .

[11]  Albert E. Moyer,et al.  The scientific imagination: case studies , 1978, Medicina e historia.

[12]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[13]  James T. Robinson.  Philosophy of Science: Implications for Teacher Education. , 1969 .

[14]  Norwood Russell Hanson,et al.  Perception and Discovery: An Introduction to Scientific Inquiry , 1970 .

[15]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research , 1982 .

[16]  J. Goodlad.  A Study of Schooling: Some Findings and Hypotheses. , 1983 .

[17]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? , 1987 .

[18]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy , 1982 .

[19]  John Ziman,et al.  Teaching and learning about science and society , 1980 .

[20]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Science teaching and the development of reasoning , 1977 .

[21]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[22]  Leo H. T. West,et al.  Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources‐of‐knowledge framework , 1986 .

[23]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[24]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[25]  Mekritt E. Kimball.  Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers , 1967 .

[26]  Hans O. Andersen,et al.  Nature of Science, 1969 and 1984: Perspectives of Preservice Secondary Science Teachers , 1986 .

[27]  L. Laudan.  Science as Problem-Solving. (Book Reviews: Progress and Its Problems. Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth) , 1977 .

[28]  C. M. Clark,et al.  Asking the Right Questions About Teacher Preparation: Contributions of Research on Teacher Thinking , 1988 .

[29]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Research on Teachers’ Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior , 1981 .

[30]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education , 1988 .

[31]  R. Giere.  Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach , 1991 .

[32]  G. Aikenhead.  Teacher decision making: The case of prairie high , 1984 .

[33]  G. Hatfield.  A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, 2nd ed. , 1983 .

[34]  Stephen Wilson,et al.  The Use of Ethnographic Techniques in Educational Research , 1974 .

[35]  Linda M. Mcneil.  Contradictions of Control, Part 1: Administrators and Teachers. , 1988 .

[36]  L. Resnick,et al.  Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception , 1983, Science.

[37]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[38]  P. Feyerabend.  Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge , 1976 .

[39]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Science and Values , 1986 .

[40]  Marjorie Powell,et al.  Research on Teaching , 1978 .

[41]  R. Duschl.  Science Education and Philosophy of Science Twenty‐Five Years of Mutually Exclusive Development , 1985 .

[42]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[43]  J. Stewart,et al.  Science content as an important consideration in science education research , 1982 .

[44]  Joseph J. Schwab.  The Practical: A Language for Curriculum , 1969, The School Review.

[45]  James V. Derose.  The Teacher Is the Key: A Report on Three NSF Studies. , 1979 .

[46]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Teachers’ Sensitivity to the Reliability of Information in Making Pedagogical Decisions , 1977 .

[47]  D. Krantz.  The structure of scientific theories. 2nd ed. , 1978 .

[48]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Philosophy of Science, Science and Science Education. , 1985 .

[49]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[50]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[51]  John R. Mergendoller,et al.  Instruction Addressing the Components of Scientific Literacy and Its Relation to Student Outcomes , 1987 .