Systematic genomic and translational efficiency studies of uveal melanoma
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ivana K. Kim | A. McKenna | K. Cibulskis | S. Gabriel | G. Getz | S. Carter | L. Garraway | E. Nickerson | D. Treacy | E. V. Van Allen | Eran Hodis | F. Vazquez | E. Gragoudas | S. Woodman | B. Esmaeli | N. Wagle | A. Lane | Ali Amin-Mansour | Sara Seepo | P. A. '. ‘t Hoen | Xiaoxing Yu | Chelsea Place Johnson
[1] B. Taylor,et al. Recurrent activating mutations of G-protein-coupled receptor CYSLTR2 in uveal melanoma , 2016, Nature Genetics.
[2] A. Enk,et al. Phase II DeCOG-Study of Ipilimumab in Pretreated and Treatment-Naïve Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma , 2015, PloS one.
[3] J. Wolchok,et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.
[4] Steven J. M. Jones,et al. Integrated Genomic Characterization of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma , 2014, Cell.
[5] Ellen T. Gelfand,et al. Parallel genome-scale loss of function screens in 216 cancer cell lines for the identification of context-specific genetic dependencies , 2014, Scientific Data.
[6] C. Emery,et al. Combined PKC and MEK inhibition in uveal melanoma with GNAQ and GNA11 mutations , 2014, Oncogene.
[7] Kang Zhang,et al. Mutant Gq/11 promote uveal melanoma tumorigenesis by activating YAP. , 2014, Cancer cell.
[8] G. Merlino,et al. Hippo-independent activation of YAP by the GNAQ uveal melanoma oncogene through a trio-regulated rho GTPase signaling circuitry. , 2014, Cancer cell.
[9] C. Emery,et al. Landscape of genetic alterations in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. , 2014 .
[10] C. Roberts,et al. Functional epigenetics approach identifies BRM/SMARCA2 as a critical synthetic lethal target in BRG1-deficient cancers , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] W. Hahn,et al. Residual Complexes Containing SMARCA2 (BRM) Underlie the Oncogenic Drive of SMARCA4 (BRG1) Mutation , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[12] S. Gabriel,et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.
[13] A. Giobbie-Hurder,et al. Clinical activity of ipilimumab for metastatic uveal melanoma , 2013, Cancer.
[14] David Gentien,et al. SF3B1 mutations are associated with alternative splicing in uveal melanoma. , 2013, Cancer discovery.
[15] J. Yokota,et al. A synthetic lethality-based strategy to treat cancers harboring a genetic deficiency in the chromatin remodeling factor BRG1. , 2013, Cancer research.
[16] N. Ban,et al. The crystal structure of the eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with eIF1 and eIF1A , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[17] T. Steitz,et al. The initiation of mammalian protein synthesis and the mechanism of scanning , 2013, Nature.
[18] A. Hinnebusch,et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3 , 2013, Nature Genetics.
[19] Catherine J. Wu,et al. SF3B1 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2013, Blood.
[20] G. Crabtree,et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy , 2013, Nature Genetics.
[21] A. Bowcock,et al. Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma , 2013, Nature Genetics.
[22] A. McKenna,et al. Evolution and Impact of Subclonal Mutations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia , 2012, Cell.
[23] Steven A. Roberts,et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .
[24] B. Hemmings,et al. Translation regulation as a therapeutic target in cancer. , 2012, Cancer research.
[25] S. Woodman,et al. Combination Small Molecule MEK and PI3K Inhibition Enhances Uveal Melanoma Cell Death in a Mutant GNAQ- and GNA11-Dependent Manner , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.
[26] A. McKenna,et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.
[27] D. Sabatini,et al. A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation , 2012, Nature.
[28] S. Woodman,et al. Genetic and molecular characterization of uveal melanoma cell lines , 2012, Pigment cell & melanoma research.
[29] S. Woodman. Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Biology and Emerging Treatments , 2012, Cancer journal.
[30] Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al. The translational landscape of mTOR signalling steers cancer initiation and metastasis , 2012, Nature.
[31] A. Bowcock,et al. Frequent Mutation of BAP1 in Metastasizing Uveal Melanomas , 2010, Science.
[32] J. O'Brien,et al. Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[33] S. Formenti,et al. Translational control in cancer , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[34] Mark D. Robinson,et al. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..
[35] G. Barsh,et al. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi , 2010 .
[36] A. Hinnebusch,et al. Regulatory elements in eIF1A control the fidelity of start codon selection by modulating tRNA(i)(Met) binding to the ribosome. , 2010, Genes & development.
[37] M. Robinson,et al. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data , 2010, Genome Biology.
[38] D. Sacks,et al. IQGAPs in cancer: A family of scaffold proteins underlying tumorigenesis , 2009, FEBS letters.
[39] Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al. Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.
[40] E. Simpson,et al. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue nevi , 2008, Nature.
[41] Mikkel A. Algire,et al. The eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A induce an open conformation of the 40S ribosome. , 2007, Molecular cell.
[42] Jon R Lorsch,et al. N‐ and C‐terminal residues of eIF1A have opposing effects on the fidelity of start codon selection , 2007, The EMBO journal.
[43] A. de Klein,et al. Clinical and cytogenetic analyses in uveal melanoma. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[44] Arun D. Singh,et al. Uveal melanoma: epidemiologic aspects. , 2005, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.
[45] A. Hinnebusch,et al. Domains of eIF1A that mediate binding to eIF2, eIF3 and eIF5B and promote ternary complex recruitment in vivo , 2003, The EMBO journal.
[46] O. Larsson,et al. Concomitant loss of chromosome 3 and whole arm losses and gains of chromosome 1, 6, or 8 in metastasizing primary uveal melanoma. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[47] O. Meyuhas. Synthesis of the translational apparatus is regulated at the translational level. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.
[48] G. Wagner,et al. The eIF1A solution structure reveals a large RNA-binding surface important for scanning function. , 2000, Molecular cell.
[49] C. Hellen,et al. Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons , 1998, Nature.
[50] N. Bornfeld,et al. Prognostic implications of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma , 1996, The Lancet.
[51] N. Bornfeld,et al. Cytogenetics of twelve cases of uveal melanoma and patterns of nonrandom anomalies and isochromosome formation. , 1995, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.
[52] D. Horsman,et al. Cytogenetic analysis of uveal melanoma consistent occurrence of monosomy 3 and trisomy 8q , 1993, Cancer.
[53] R. Glynn,et al. Survival of patients with metastases from uveal melanoma. , 1991, Ophthalmology.
[54] Sozen,et al. Mutations in GNA 11 in Uveal Melanoma , 2022 .